Study on sex crimes based on questionable methodology – Part 1

A study on the growth of juvenile prostitution that was used at a Congressional hearing to inform members of the subcommittee of the House Judiciary in September may be flawed.

The study released by the Women’s Funding Network tracked the growth of juvenile prostitution and found the sex crime had risen exponentially in three diverse states. Those states were Minnesota, New York and Michigan. Further research has been conducted on the study and according to various university researchers the data behind the study is flawed. Over the next two posts we will discuss the study and the research that examined the study’s data.

According to the research released by Women’s Funding Network the trafficking of underage girls increased dramatically in Minnesota, New York and Michigan over the six-month time period the study reviewed. In New York, underage sex trafficking increased by almost 21 percent. In Michigan, it increased by 39.2 percent, and in Minnesota it increased by almost 65 percent. According to a sociologist at the University of Minnesota who teaches research methodology, the study is fundamentally flawed.

The sociologist says the study would never appear in a peer-reviewed journal because there are too many unanswered questions regarding the methodology. The chairman of the Anthropology Department at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York agrees. The professor conducted a study on juvenile prostitution in 2008 and says he would not trust the numbers used in the study. In fact, one of the groups that initiated the study admits as much and says the accurate language from the study did not fit well in their marketing effort.

A consortium of three nonprofits hired a business consulting group to conduct the study. The business consulting group had never conducted a prostitution study and members of the group were not academic researchers. The group devised a method to track the growth of underage prostitution by tracking the number of young-looking women on online classified sites. Next time we will further explore the methodology used in the business consulting group’s study.

Source: Westword, “Women’s Funding Network sex-trafficking study is junk science,” Nick Pinto, 3/24/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.