Study on sex crimes based on questionable methodology – Part 1

A study on the growth of juvenile prostitution that was used at a Congressional hearing to inform members of the subcommittee of the House Judiciary in September may be flawed.

The study released by the Women’s Funding Network tracked the growth of juvenile prostitution and found the sex crime had risen exponentially in three diverse states. Those states were Minnesota, New York and Michigan. Further research has been conducted on the study and according to various university researchers the data behind the study is flawed. Over the next two posts we will discuss the study and the research that examined the study’s data.

According to the research released by Women’s Funding Network the trafficking of underage girls increased dramatically in Minnesota, New York and Michigan over the six-month time period the study reviewed. In New York, underage sex trafficking increased by almost 21 percent. In Michigan, it increased by 39.2 percent, and in Minnesota it increased by almost 65 percent. According to a sociologist at the University of Minnesota who teaches research methodology, the study is fundamentally flawed.

The sociologist says the study would never appear in a peer-reviewed journal because there are too many unanswered questions regarding the methodology. The chairman of the Anthropology Department at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York agrees. The professor conducted a study on juvenile prostitution in 2008 and says he would not trust the numbers used in the study. In fact, one of the groups that initiated the study admits as much and says the accurate language from the study did not fit well in their marketing effort.

A consortium of three nonprofits hired a business consulting group to conduct the study. The business consulting group had never conducted a prostitution study and members of the group were not academic researchers. The group devised a method to track the growth of underage prostitution by tracking the number of young-looking women on online classified sites. Next time we will further explore the methodology used in the business consulting group’s study.

Source: Westword, “Women’s Funding Network sex-trafficking study is junk science,” Nick Pinto, 3/24/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.