Mar 17, 2016

Supreme Court Hears Oral Arguments On Implied Consent

On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments about criminal penalties for drivers who refuse to take sobriety tests. The case has serious implications for thousands of drivers throughout the country who are stopped under suspicion of DWI each year.

Implied Consent

At the center of the debate is the issue of implied consent. Implied consent is consent granted through a person’s action or inaction. In DWI cases, states use the idea of implied consent to say that drivers voluntarily agree to submit to sobriety tests if they have been stopped for a DWI as a condition for using public roads.

The Key Issues

Opponents of implied consent statutes, including almost every St. Paul criminal defense attorney, claim that requiring drivers to submit to sobriety tests is a violation of the person’s Fourth Amendment freedoms. The nature of the test, blood or breath is immaterial, because no person should be criminalized for refusing an unlawful search.

Supporters argue that implied consent laws are one of the best ways to prevent drunk driving accidents. The cornerstone of the argument is that driving is a privilege, not a right, and drivers must submit to sobriety tests in order to promote the public good.

Changes in communications technology have put the ideas of implied consent and warrantless arrests in the spotlight, according to a St. Paul criminal defense attorney. During oral arguments, the Justices argued mobile technology allows officers to communicate with judges and secure warrants for DWI arrests any time, eliminating the need for implied consent.

Impact On DWI

Observers in the courtroom believe the Supreme Court will decide against the state of Minnesota, and rule felony charges for refusing to take the test unconstitutional. The Court is likely to prohibit criminal penalties for people who refuse to take sobriety tests, unless the State presents a warrant at the time of the request. It is also likely that the Court will continue to support civil penalties, such as the suspension of the driver’s license, for test refusals.

A St. Paul criminal defense attorney will be more equipped to fight a DWI arrest when clients are no longer required to take a sobriety test that is admissible in court.

The Supreme Court’s decision is expected in just a few weeks, and most legal observers expect the Court to continue its current trend of protecting citizens against unlawful search and seizure, as well as warrantless arrests.

Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active

Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Aug: 30, 2024

Do Juvenile Crimes Impact College Admissions?

Students with juvenile convictions in their records and intending to apply for college may wonder, “Do juvenile crimes impact college admissions?” A juvenile crime in Minnesota can lower the odds of your child’s college application getting approved. A conviction of a serious juvenile crime may result in an automatic rejection of college applications. A minor with a criminal record may be disqualified from accessing student loans or grants.

Aug: 30, 2024

What Is the Post-Conviction Process, and How Long Does It Take?

Defendants convicted of a crime may ask, “What is the post-conviction process, and how long does it take?” A petition for post-conviction relief allows you to contest the legality of a criminal conviction or sentence following an unsuccessful direct appeal process or passing the appeal deadline. This petition involves legal issues not addressed at trial or direct appeal. These issues include a constitutional rights violation, newly discovered evidence, and inadequate or ineffective lawyer representation.

Aug: 30, 2024

How Long Does the Sentencing Phase Take?

Knowing how long the sentencing phase takes in Minneapolis, MN, can help you ease worries and work towards receiving a fair sentence. The sentencing phase of the criminal justice process usually takes only minutes, especially when the judge approves the sentence negotiated in a plea bargain. Sentencing can sometimes be lengthy, particularly when you get convicted at trial, and the judge schedules a hearing to a later date to decide on appropriate legal penalties. The nature and seriousness of the criminal conviction, whether your sentence is negotiated or determined by a judge, and continuance motions are some factors that may affect the length of the sentencing phase.