Teammates of Slain College Football Player Want Charges Dropped – Part 1

Four teammates of the Pace University student and football player who was fatally shot by police on October 17 want an immediate dismissal of their charges. In this post, we will talk about the recent court proceedings related to the investigation. In our next post, we will talk about the conflicting stories of the teammates who say they tried to help their friend and the police who charged the teammates with obstruction of justice and interfering with their friend’s medical aid.

The criminal charges against the four Pace University football players stem from the shooting death of their 20-year-old teammate and fellow student. The 20-year-old student was close to the scene of a disturbance outside of a bar and was shot to death in his car on October 17. According to police, the shooting occurred after the young man drove away and hit two police officers when an officer knocked on the young student’s car window. The shooting death occurred 25 miles north of New York City in Thornwood, New York. The investigation of the fatal shooting is ongoing and is being coordinated by the district attorney.

The young student’s four friends were arrested for allegedly interfering with their friend’s medical aid. The criminal defense attorney for the four college football players argues the charges filed against the players are a police brutality cover-up. Commenting on successfully opposing the prosecution’s request for the postponement of the teammates’ appearance in court, the defense attorney said if the prosecution does not have enough evidence now, then the police did not have enough evidence to charge the college players.

Prosecutors had asked for a two week postponement for the appearance of the four teammates in court. Even though postponement requests usually do not raise any opposition from the defense, the criminal defense attorney of the four students objected to the request explaining the claim of an ongoing investigation is insufficient to deny the four teammates of their right to a prompt arraignment. In our next post, we will discuss the conflicting stories that led to the four teammates’ arrest.

Source: The Washington Post, “Slain Man’s NY Teammates: Drop Charges Against Us,” Jim Fitzgerald, 11/3/10

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.