How should teenagers be punished for sex crimes?

Parents in Minneapolis-St. Paul know that teenagers are headstrong and sometimes act without thinking about the consequences of their actions. This is especially true when it comes to young love — Minnesota teenagers will have relationships with whomever they please, especially when their parents disapprove.

The problem, of course, is that when a teenager is 18-years-old, he or she is considered an adult and if his or her boyfriend of girlfriend is under the age of consent, he or she could face a charge of statutory rape.

Let’s say that an 18-year-old high-school senior is dating a 14-year-old high-school freshman. If he has a consensual sexual relationship with his girlfriend, he might be committing statutory rape because his girlfriend cannot legally consent to the relationship. But, just because these two teenagers decide to have sex, does that mean the 18-year-old should be sent to jail and forced to register as a sex offender? Many parents are saying no.

Parents in Minnesota and in every other state in the country have been pushing legislators to change how teenage sex offenders are punished. These so-called “Romeo and Juliet” laws aim to reduce and completely change the punishments for young adults who have sex with minors. Many of these parent-activists do not condone sexual intercourse with anyone under the age of consent, but they believe that if the age difference between the two parties is fairly minimal, punishments should not be so severe.

One of the common suggestions is that teenagers attend mandatory counseling or are admitted to a treatment center rather they being sent to jail. According to a program director with an international non-profit, juvenile sex offenders only reoffend 4 to 7 percent of the time, much lower than the rate of adult recidivism.

Source: The Daily Beast, “Should Teens Be Jailed for Sex Offenses?” Abigail Pesta, Jan. 25, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.