Thirty Air Force personnel to be discharged over possession of synthetic marijuana

Synthetic marijuana and other synthetic drugs have caused quite a stir and a good amount of controversy over the last few months as law enforcement and the legal system try to adopt their strategies to combat the drugs. Synthetic marijuana was added to the federal government’s list of banned substances in March and many states have added varying forms of synthetic marijuana to their list of drug crimes.

The U.S. military has also had issues with synthetic drugs. Recently, the Air Force discharged 30 airmen for possession or use of the synthetic marijuana, “Spice.” The airmen were located at Tinker Air Force Base in Oklahoma.

Spice is a combination of herbs sprayed with a chemical that mimics the active ingredient of marijuana, THC. The synthetic chemical produces a high when smoked. Spice was first sold in Europe and has gained popularity in the United States over the last couple years.

The Office of Special Investigations of the United States Air Force conducted an investigation after the federal ban was instituted. The investigation revealed that 30 airmen were in possession of the drug or were using the drug. The rank of the airmen in the investigation varied from airman to senior airman, and about 15 of the airmen were regular users of the drug who provided the drug to other airmen. All 30 airmen are being discharged from the military.

The commander of the Air Force base said the investigation is a warning to others and demonstrates that the Air Force will not tolerate the use of controlled substances no matter how they are derived. The base commander also said that service members need to understand that Spice is a Schedule One controlled substance, and any members who use it are jeopardizing their military careers.

Service members who test positive for synthetic drugs can be court-martialed, dishonorably discharged, confined for at least five years, docked pay and demoted.

Source: NewsOK.com, “Air Force to discharge 30 Tinker airmen for possession of synthetic marijuana,”Bryan Dean, 6/14/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.