Understanding entrapment in Minnesota

Entrapment refers to any situation where a person is induced or persuaded to commit a criminal offense by a police officer so that they can obtain evidence to prosecute that person. However, it is important to understand that entrapment does not refer to situations where the person was already pre-disposed to commit a crime and the law enforcement official was merely present to witness the action. 

Opportunity versus entrapment 

Entrapment generally occurs when government agents or law enforcement  officers resort to fraud, flattery, harassment or threats in order to cause a person to commit a crime. Entrapment cases often occur in situations where:

  • A  police officer poses as a minor online and then encourages the defendant to meet for a sexual encounter
  • An undercover law enforcement official poses as a consumer with the intent to purchase drugs from the defendant
  • An undercover officer poses as a hooker and then offers sexual services to the defendant 

There is a difference between entrapment and providing a person the opportunity to commit a crime. An example of an entrapment case would be if a woman is charged for selling illegal drugs to an undercover police officer after several weeks of the officer stopping by the woman’s home and begging her to sell him drugs despite several refusals.

In comparison, if the police officer begged the woman to provide him with illegal drugs and the woman gave in without hesitation, the police officer’s actions would not be considered entrapment because, although he gave the woman an opportunity to break the law, he did not engage in overbearing or extreme behavior.  

The defendant’s role 

The Minnesota Office of the Revisor of Statutes states that defendants must inform the prosecutor in writing that they plan to use entrapment as part of their defense strategy. In order for entrapment to be considered as part of their case, defendants must also admit that they did commit the crime for which they have been charged. After defendants have done what they can to prove that they were persuaded by a law enforcement official to commit a crime, it is up to the state to determine whether or not the defendants were predisposed to engage in this illegal behavior.

If it cannot be proven that the defendant would have committed the crime without the temptation caused by a law enforcement official, the entrapment case will likely be successful. Those who have been charged with a crime may benefit from working with an attorney who can provide guidance in building a strong case that proves evidence of entrapment was present.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.