How unique is your hair? The FBI is looking into it

For decades the FBI has been using hair analysis and other forms of DNA testing to aid in the conviction of defendants.

The science has certainly helped defendants who are accused of violent crimes, murder and rape to clear their name, too, but the FBI has recently announced that it will be looking into some of its cases to check for faulty science. One of the biggest problems the FBI has had, it seems, is agents making claims about hair analysis that can’t be supported by science. When those statements led to a conviction, it is very possible that the wrong person was convicted.

The review will start with cases in which the defendants were sentenced to death row, meaning Minnesota cases won’t be reviewed for a while. When they are, however, there may be good news for Minnesotans who are locked up for serious sex crimes they never committed.

Unfortunately, juries are easily persuaded by DNA evidence. When someone gets up and says that hair found at the crime scene matches the defendant’s or that hair is so unique that it could not possibly belong to anyone else, the jury is likely to take that testimony at face value. Unfortunately, if police or scientists are stretching the truth, this could have disastrous effects.

Fortunately, the FBI has announced that it will be reviewing a large number of cases. Moreover, it has said that it will waive any statute of limitations arguments or federal rules that would otherwise prohibit an appeal.

Although this will not initially affect Minnesota, many individuals in Minnesota’s prisons will eventually have their convictions reviewed after years in prison.

Source: The Washington Post, “U.S. reviewing 27 death penalty convictions for FBI forensic testimony errors,” Spence S. Hsu, July 17, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.