Vietnamese Internet Crime Ring Has Possible Links to Minnesota

A Vietnamese internet crime ring under investigation for a number of white collar crimes including fraud, money laundering and identity theft may have a connection to Minnesota. The federal investigation is being conducted by the United States Department of Homeland Security and is called “Operation eMule.” The crime ring uses hundreds of stolen identities to swindle thousands of dollars from online retailers. Two 22-year-old college students from Winona State University have been linked to the ring by investigators.

According to federal investigator the Vietnam based internet crime ring uses stolen identities to open online accounts with PayPal, eBay and financial institutions. After the online accounts are set up, they are used to sell expensive goods at discounted prices. The sellers from the crime ring obtain the goods they sell by purchasing goods from online retailers like Amazon and Dell with stolen financial accounts. Once the individuals who had their identities stolen realize their financial accounts were used to purchase goods in their name, they dispute the charges with the online retailers who then foot the bill of the scam artists.

The two students from Winona State University have been linked to the internet crime ring as “eMules” or electronic money mules. Money mules use stolen identities to open up financial accounts in the United States and wire received money to accounts that are based abroad and owned by crime ring. One student is linked to opening 24 eBay accounts and opening 56 other accounts under stolen information. Around $247,000 was transferred through these accounts. The other student is linked to opening 310 PayPal accounts and 157 eBay accounts also with stolen identities. Around $1million was transferred with these accounts. A supervisory agent with the FBI has said that often eMules are tricked into participation because they are recruited through seemingly legitimate online job postings.

Source: Star Tribune, “Cyber Crime Trail Leads to Winona State Students,” Dan Browning, 1/1/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.