West Memphis Three released from prison thanks to continuous criminal defense

A strong criminal defense highlighting the fact that shoddy and circumstantial evidence was the only thing linking three men to a series of infamous murders in 1993 eventually led to the men’s release from prison.

Having been locked up 18 years for the alleged murders of three second-grade children in West Memphis, Arkansas the men were finally released in a plea agreement where they were required to plead guilty, even though they maintain their innocence.

Dubbed the West Memphis Three, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jesse Misskelley were put behind bars after three second-grade children were found dead, hogtied in a ditch and their bodies mutilated. Accusers speculated that the three men, teens at the time, were driven to the act by a satanic ritual. The other-worldly claims were laid on the teens because they were different from many others in the community they lived in. In fact, one of the pieces of so-called evidence introduced in the case was a Blue Oyster Cult record that one of the men listened to.

Another main piece of evidence was a knife found near the home of one of the men, but as time went on, doubt rose on whether the knife could have inflicted the murder wounds. There was also no DNA to link the weapon to the murder.

Echols, the alleged mastermind of the attack, had been on death row during the entire time he served his sentence and was confined to an isolated cell. As time passed and more people focused on the evidence in the case it grew in popularity. Eventually celebrities like actor Johnny Depp and Pearl Jam singer Eddie began to lobby for the men’s innocence.

Now that the men are out of jail, they are working on piecing their lives together and acclimating themselves to a far different world than they remembered.

Source: CNN, “Decades without daylight: ‘West Memphis Three’ describe life in prison,” Sept. 30, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.