West Memphis Three released from prison thanks to continuous criminal defense

A strong criminal defense highlighting the fact that shoddy and circumstantial evidence was the only thing linking three men to a series of infamous murders in 1993 eventually led to the men’s release from prison.

Having been locked up 18 years for the alleged murders of three second-grade children in West Memphis, Arkansas the men were finally released in a plea agreement where they were required to plead guilty, even though they maintain their innocence.

Dubbed the West Memphis Three, Damien Echols, Jason Baldwin and Jesse Misskelley were put behind bars after three second-grade children were found dead, hogtied in a ditch and their bodies mutilated. Accusers speculated that the three men, teens at the time, were driven to the act by a satanic ritual. The other-worldly claims were laid on the teens because they were different from many others in the community they lived in. In fact, one of the pieces of so-called evidence introduced in the case was a Blue Oyster Cult record that one of the men listened to.

Another main piece of evidence was a knife found near the home of one of the men, but as time went on, doubt rose on whether the knife could have inflicted the murder wounds. There was also no DNA to link the weapon to the murder.

Echols, the alleged mastermind of the attack, had been on death row during the entire time he served his sentence and was confined to an isolated cell. As time passed and more people focused on the evidence in the case it grew in popularity. Eventually celebrities like actor Johnny Depp and Pearl Jam singer Eddie began to lobby for the men’s innocence.

Now that the men are out of jail, they are working on piecing their lives together and acclimating themselves to a far different world than they remembered.

Source: CNN, “Decades without daylight: ‘West Memphis Three’ describe life in prison,” Sept. 30, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.