Senators Want DUI Applications Removed From Smartphones

In March, four Democratic U.S. Senators, Harry Reid, D-Utah, Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., and Tom Udall, D-N.M., drafted a letter requesting that Apple, Google and Research in Motion (or RIM) eliminate the applications (user-friendly computer programs for specific tasks) on mobile communication devices that warn drivers of the locations of drunk-driving checkpoints.

The next day, RIM, the manufacturer of the BlackBerry agreed to the removal of driving-under-the-influence (DUI/DWI) checkpoint functionality on its BlackBerry devices.

Google later responded that it did not remove apps for any reason other than violations of the Android content policies.

Apple did not issue a public response to the request.

PhantomALERT Checkpointer Mr. DUI Buzzed Fuzz Alert

These apps, which work on smartphones and most GPS devices, provide alerts to warn drivers of impending speed traps, red-light cameras, railroad crossings and school zones.

Many of the programs use reports from other drivers to maintain the currency of the information. The DUI/DWI checkpoint warnings, however, sparked the interest of the senators who noted in their letter to the tech companies:

“We appreciate the technology that has allowed millions of Americans to have information at their fingertips, but giving drunk drivers a free tool to evade checkpoints, putting innocent families and children at risk, is a matter of public concern. We hope that you will give our request to make these applications unavailable immediate consideration.”

Are All of These Apps Bad?

The USA Today story that first brought the apps to the attention of the senators, mentions that not all law enforcement sees these warnings as a bad thing. USA Today quotes Officer Brian Walters from Virginia Beach, Va., who is responsible for the city’s red-light camera program, felt the applications might be helpful: “I’m all for them,” he says.

“A couple of GPS companies have sent me requests to verify and validate where our cameras are. I helped them.” He says the devices and apps make drivers more aware while driving. “If that’s what gets them to comply, that’s fine,” he says.

The story also quotes a driver who thinks using his GPS with the PhantomAlert app makes him a better driver because the alerts force him to pay better attention to his driving and his surroundings.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can Past Allegations of Sex Crimes Be Used Against You in Minnesota?

One question people charged with a sex crime in Minneapolis, MN, ask is: Can past allegations of sex crimes be used against me? Under Minnesota Rules of Evidence, past sex crime allegations aren't admissible as evidence in court to prove a suspect's character and argue that it contributed to the commission of the current crime. However, there are circumstances in which the court may allow prior allegations or bad conduct as evidence. These circumstances include when the prosecution can demonstrate that prior allegations or acts are key to establishing intent, identity, or pattern of bad conduct related to the current crime.

What If The Alleged Victim Was Drunk? Minnesota Consent & Alcohol Laws

Under Minnesota consent & alcohol laws, it is unlawful to engage in sexual contact or intercourse with someone drunk or intoxicated to a degree that prevents that person from consenting, understanding, or keeping his or her actions in check. Simply put, you should avoid sexual contact with a person who visibly looks impaired by alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances.

How Long Do Police Have to File Drug Charges in Minnesota?

People facing arrests or under investigation for drug-related crimes often wonder: How long do police have to file drug charges in Minnesota? Once police officers conclude their investigations and arrest you for drug trafficking, the law bars them from holding you in custody for long. But, even if they can't keep you in jail, the Minnesota statute of limitations allows the prosecution to file the charges within three (3) years of arrest.