Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Innocent Owner DWI Vehicle Forfeiture Case Won By Keller Law

Earlier this month, Minnesota DWI Forfeiture Attorney Max Keller successfully asserted an innocent owner defense in a Dakota County DWI Forfeiture case. As a result, his client’s vehicle was returned to her, the innocent owner.

When an individual is charged with 1st or 2nd degree DWI, the charging police agency can seize the vehicle for forfeiture. Seizure is possible even if the offender who commits the DWI is NOT the owner of the vehicle. That is, an inncent owner who lets his friend or relative borrow a vehicle can have the vehicle seized if his friend commits a 1st or 2nd degree DWI.

Some protection exists for this owner. Minnesota’s forfeiture statute allows for an “innocent owner” defense. Under the innocent owner defense, the owner of the vehicle must prove that she did not know the vehicle would be used in any unlawful manner. If this innocent owner can prove this by a preponderance of the evidence, then the vehicle is returned.

Max Keller’s recent forfeiture involved this innocent owner defense. In his case, the owner of the vehicle was a passenger in her own car. She was drunk, and had her (now ex) boyfriend drive her home. The owner thought her ex boyfriend was sober. The car was stopped by the police, and the boyfriend submitted to a preliminary breath test registering .11. At the station, he refused to submit to a test. Because he had one prior offense and refused to submit to a test, two aggravating factors were present and he was charged with 2nd degree DWI. Because he was charged with 2nd degree DWI, the owner’s vehicle was subject to forfeiture.

The owner hired Max Keller. Max filed a demand for judicial determination to contest the forfeiture. Max convinced the police department to return the vehicle to his client, the owner, while the offender’s criminal case was pending. The offender, who was represented by a different attorney, was convicted of 2nd degree DWI – test refusal.

Max proceeded to a contested hearing. His client, the owner, testified on her own behalf. Max later filed a brief on the matter. Ultimately, the Judge agreed with Max that his client was an “innocent owner.” The vehicle was ordered to be returned to his client, and his client was reimbursed for the filing fee.

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Handcuffed person sitting behind small bags of illegal drugs. Drug Possession if the Drugs Aren’t Yours

Can You Be Charged With Drug Possession if the Drugs Aren’t Yours in Minnesota?

You can be charged with drug possession if the drugs aren’t yours in Minnesota. This is one of the most misunderstood areas of criminal law. Many people assume that if they did not own or physically hold the drugs, they cannot be charged. In reality, Minnesota law allows prosecutors to pursue charges based on something called constructive possession.
Man on a phone call while using a laptop. Contact the Alleged Victim After Charges

What Happens if You Contact the Alleged Victim After Charges Are Filed in Minnesota?

If you contact the alleged victim after charges are filed in Minnesota, you may be putting your case, your freedom, and your future at risk. Once criminal charges are filed, courts often impose strict no-contact conditions, either through bail conditions, release orders, or protective orders. Violating those conditions can lead to additional criminal charges, even if your intent was harmless.
A young man with bruises posing for a mugshot. Accused of Sharing Intimate Images

Accused of Sharing Intimate Images Without Consent in Minnesota? What to Know

Being accused of sharing intimate images without consent in Minnesota can have consequences that go far beyond the criminal justice system. These cases often involve allegations tied to digital communication, private relationships, and intent, which makes them both legally complex and highly sensitive.