Domestic Violence: When Victims Strike Back

In many cases, victims of domestic violence will attempt to defend themselves or their children from abusers by committing a violent act against the perpetrator. Unfortunately, the abusers sometimes try to turn things around and convince police that the real victim is actually the aggressor. These actions often result in battered victims being charged with domestic violence or assault themselves. It’s a cruel twist for victims who simply try to defend themselves. Domestic violence is a serious crime and a such a conviction can lead to significant fines, jail or prison time, and a criminal record that can haunt offenders for years to come.

When is Self Defense Justified in Minnesota?

In Minnesota, when a victim is not the original aggressor, reasonably perceives an imminent threat, and his or her actions are proportionate to the situation, acts of self-defense may be justified in court. Unfortunately, inadequate investigation of the crime scene, complicated circumstances and histories can sometimes make it difficult for a victim and his or her criminal defense lawyer to prove that the violent acts were in fact, defensive and not offensive. To make matters worse, many types of abuse like emotional attacks, violent threats, and isolation, can lead to a victim’s fear and acts of self-defense but are not visually evident. Therefore, it is vital that investigating officers are familiar with the dynamics of domestic violence.

Determining the Predominant Aggressor

To help prevent the abuser from manipulating the system and turning the tables on the real victim in domestic violence cases, a variety of factors must be considered.

  • Any history or previous convictions of violence or threats of violence
  • Orders for protection that have been filed
  • The identification of both defensive and offensive injuries
  • Witness statements and how they support other evidence in the case
  • The demeanor of each party

When the predominant aggressor is misidentified, the victim could face serious, life-changing consequences. In addition to substantial fines and jail time, his or her child custody or parenting time rights, housing, employment, and even immigration rights could all be at stake.

More than one million women and thousands of men are victims of domestic violence committed by an intimate partner every year. Sadly, when many of these victims strike back, they suddenly become victims of the legal system as well.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.