Accurate DWI Results are a Real Challenge

Breathalyzers are like any other machine. If they are not properly used, or if they are not properly calibrated, the machine will return inaccurate results. In order for these devices to be effective, they must be used and calibrated to exacting specifications. The more a breathalyzer is used, the more likely it is to malfunction.

Common problems with breathalyzer results known to DWI lawyers in Minneapolis is that they cannot differentiate between alcoholic beverages, and the types of alcohol the digestion of certain foods can cause. Foods high in yeast and sugar for example can produce false results. This is because of the process known as ketosis during which the body burns fat for energy. The process produces isopropyl alcohol which is different than the ethanol found in alcoholic beverages. However, breathalyzers cannot tell the difference between the two.

Another problem is that if an individual has an elevated body temperature, from say a cold or flu, it can change the reading. It can be a significant change that can range between 6.5 and 9%. This is more than enough to sway a breathalyzer reading over the legal limit in Minnesota.

Medical conditions can also impact the accuracy of breathalyzer readings. Conditions such as heartburn or gastroesophageal reflux disease can cause digestive fluid to enter the mouth. When this happens, this can increase the amount of alcohol a breathalyzer picks up in its reading. Given the fact that these are very common medical conditions, and that under Minnesota’s mandatory DWI testing laws many opt for roadside breathalyzer tests, these two conditions alone have the potential to bring into question the accuracy of a large number of breathalyzer tests.

In Minnesota, breathalyzer results processed through the Minnesota Crime Lab are currently being challenged. That is because of the way the state calculates device bias and the way the measurements are recorded. The concern is that innocent people are being convicted of DWI when in reality they were under the legal limit when the breathalyzer was performed. It is quite possible the outcome of these challenges will impact DWI results and cases throughout the state.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.