Aiding and Abetting: You Can Be Held Liable for Another Person’s Crime

A person who helps another person commit a crime can face criminal charges. Aiding and abetting, sometimes known as accomplice liability, is a legal tool that imposes penalties that are the same as those of the actual crime itself. A key factor in the case of a person charged with aiding and abetting a crime is the level of help he or she provided.

Criminal Liability for Another Person’s Crime

Minnesota Statutes can hold a person criminally responsible for a crime committed by another person if he or she aided or abetted the crime. Intentionally helping, guiding, hiring, scheming, encouraging, or otherwise getting someone else to commit a crime are all components of aiding and abetting liability. If a person assists a friend to plan a bank robbery, for instance, that person can be criminally liable for the bank robbery.

The aiding and abetting law is quite broad. Consequently, almost anything that helps in the commission of a crime could be a ground for aiding and abetting liability. An accomplice can be held criminally responsible for any new offense committed during the planned crime if the new offense was reasonably foreseeable. A person who aids a bank robbery, for instance, would be liable for assault or murder if a bank employee is assaulted or killed during the robbery

A person charged with aiding and abetting in Minneapolis, MN, requires legal representation from a Minneapolis criminal lawyer to lower the odds of further prosecution. The lawyer can offer insight and direction from the start of the legal process to the case determination. The lawyer can also help the accused person prepare adequately for his or her day in court.

Avoiding Criminal Liability for Another Person’s Crime in Minnesota

Under Minnesota law, a person can avoid aiding or abetting liability if he or she quits the crime and makes a justifiable effort to avert the crime. In simple terms, a person who abandons a criminal scheme and takes reasonable steps to stop it can use the abandonment of the crime as a defense against his or her criminal liability.

There is no specific criterion for determining what qualifies as a justifiable effort to stop the commission of a crime. For this reason, reporting the crime to the police and notifying the targeted victim may both qualify as a justifiable effort to avert the commission of a crime.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Confidential informants may provide integral information to help build criminal investigations, but how reliable is that information when they are receiving payment for their services? To protect them, state law requires the identity of informants be kept confidential. For those facing criminal charges, however, this creates challenges in questioning the accuracy and validity of the information given at trial.
Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.