Burnsville woman sentenced to over 4 years in felony DWI case

A Burnsville woman who pled guilty to felony DWI test refusal and drug possession charges has been sentenced to just over four years in prison after pleading guilty to two of three charged felonies. One count of felony DWI was dismissed. In March, this blog discussed the case against the woman who was accused of drugged driving after a December 2010 traffic stop.

The woman reportedly had refused to submit a blood sample under Minnesota’s implied consent law on the night of her arrest and was charged with DWI. The woman’s charges were enhanced to the felony DWI charges based upon a Felony criminal vehicular operation conviction from 2005.

In the recent case, police claimed that they could smell marijuana in the car during the traffic stop, and that prescription pills were found during a search of the car. She was charged with felony driving under the influence of a controlled substance, felony DWI test refusal and felony possession of a controlled substance after her arrest.

In March, as this blog reported, the woman sought to take her case to a jury. The Dakota County prosecutor reportedly had said in March that he intended to seek a 10-year prison sentence against the woman. That 10-year sentence reportedly would have been what is known as an upward departure.

Experienced DWI defense lawyers know that Minnesota sentencing laws are complex, and sentences can vary greatly in individual cases based upon a variety of factors and arguments before the sentencing judge.

The lengthy prison sentence that Dakota County prosecutors planned to pursue would have been double the presumptive recommended sentence under Minnesota’s sentencing guidelines, according to a story in the St. Paul Pioneer Press. The woman faced sentencing at a hearing earlier this week and the judge imposed a sentence of four-years-three months in prison for the woman, significantly less than the prosecutor had wanted.

Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press, “Burnsville woman gets prison for second DWI,” Maricella Miranda, May 2, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.
Minnesota recently passed a public safety bill that brings sweeping changes to the state’s juvenile justice system. While minors sometimes run afoul of the law, the juvenile justice system seeks to account for the differences between children and adults. Therefore, while the penalties for adults convicted of crimes focus on punishment, those for juveniles are aimed at diversion and restorative practices.