Call Today

Jan 27, 2014

Burnsville woman takes felony DWI and drug charges to trial

A Burnsville woman reportedly is taking her Minnesota felony DWI case before a jury in April. Anyone facing DWI charges, whether the accused is facing a first-time misdemeanor offense or the person is charged with a higher level of DWI, has the right to take the state’s case before a jury. The right to a jury trial is but one of many vital constitutional rights that defendants have to protect all of our rights under our system of justice.

The current Dakota County case against the Burnsville woman includes allegations that the woman was driving while impaired. Reports suggest that the woman refused to submit to a blood or urine test on the night of her arrest, which was Dec. 24, 2010.

Police claim that the woman had run through a stop sign, swerved and then stopped in the intersection before continuing forward. A police officer pulled the woman over, apparently for rolling too far into the controlled intersection before stopping.

The officer claims that he could smell marijuana in the car. He also says that he found two prescription bottles, with the labels scratched off, containing oxycodone in the center console. The woman reportedly told the officer she had a prescription for the medication. The woman was arrested and refused to submit to the chemical test.

As this blog has previously discussed, test refusal under Minnesota’s DWI and implied consent laws is itself considered a crime. However, the woman is facing a felony level offense based upon allegations that she has a prior felony DWI conviction on her record, dating from 2005 based upon allegations arising in Inver Grove Heights. As this blog has explained, a Minnesota law allows prosecutors to seek felony DWI charges against a person who has a prior felony DWI conviction on his or her record.

The current felony charges against the woman also include fifth-degree controlled substance crime allegations for alleged unlawful drug possession.

Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press, “Burnsville woman convicted in 2005 fatalities is again accused of DWI,” Maricella Miranda, Mar. 14, 2012

Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active

Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

Jun: 18, 2026

What Are the Consequences of Insurance Fraud in Minnesota?

Potential consequences of insurance fraud depend on whether the offense gets reported to the police for investigation and prosecution.

Jun: 18, 2026

What Is the Exclusionary Rule in a Criminal Case?

So, what is the exclusionary rule, and how does it apply to your case? The exclusionary rule is a court-driven rule that takes effect when evidence in a criminal case is unlawfully obtained. In your case, a court might use the exclusionary rule if the illegally obtained evidence helped the officers get other pieces of evidence they would not have found otherwise. The secondary evidence subject to the exclusionary rule is referred to as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The exclusionary rule borrows its reasoning from constitutional rights. So, it applies to criminal cases as a deterrent and remedy rather than a standalone constitutional right.

Jun: 18, 2026

What Happens If You Violate Probation in Minnesota?

People who suspect that they have violated probation or are already facing a violation charge might ask, “What happens if you violate probation?” A probation violation in Minneapolis, Minnesota could result in a range of consequences, depending on the type and severity of the violation. Those consequences include reprimand from probation officers, enhanced supervision and stricter conditions, and probation revocation and incarceration.