Court: Party hosts not to blame for underage drinking and crash

It’s not easy for any parent or loved one to lose a family member or friend. It is natural to look for someone to blame in such instances, and sometimes that blame is just. If someone owed a responsibility to someone and their negligence leads to death, then the courts will often hold negligent parties accountable, criminally, civilly or both.

We usually don’t cover out-of-state cases on this blog, but a recent ruling in an Illinois underage drinking case is worth covering. In a civil case against a couple who hosted a 2006 party, the court found that the party hosts aren’t legally accountable for a fatal DWI crash caused by one of their underage party guests.

According to news reports, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in favor of the defendants today. The court based its decision on its belief that the party hosts didn’t claim any responsibility over their party guests. Also, they reportedly did not provide the alcohol to underage guests.

The court ruled differently than another court in the criminal case against the parties.

In this underage DWI incident, the man who drank and then drove was 18 years old. In other words, he was too young to legally drink. While that is true, the court highlighted the fact that even though the crash victim was underage, he was still legally an adult, making him more responsible for his actions.

The court apparently saw it as a stretch to blame the defendants for a mistake that another adult chose to make. What do you think about this case or issue in general? Do you think that the couple in this case owed a duty to their 18-year-old party guest?

Source

Daily Herald: “Lake Co. couple not liable in underage drunk driving death,” Jeff Engelhardt, 19 May 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Students with juvenile convictions in their records and intending to apply for college may wonder, “Do juvenile crimes impact college admissions?” A juvenile crime in Minnesota can lower the odds of your child’s college application getting approved. A conviction of a serious juvenile crime may result in an automatic rejection of college applications. A minor with a criminal record may be disqualified from accessing student loans or grants.
Defendants convicted of a crime may ask, “What is the post-conviction process, and how long does it take?” A petition for post-conviction relief allows you to contest the legality of a criminal conviction or sentence following an unsuccessful direct appeal process or passing the appeal deadline. This petition involves legal issues not addressed at trial or direct appeal. These issues include a constitutional rights violation, newly discovered evidence, and inadequate or ineffective lawyer representation.
Knowing how long the sentencing phase takes in Minneapolis, MN, can help you ease worries and work towards receiving a fair sentence. The sentencing phase of the criminal justice process usually takes only minutes, especially when the judge approves the sentence negotiated in a plea bargain. Sentencing can sometimes be lengthy, particularly when you get convicted at trial, and the judge schedules a hearing to a later date to decide on appropriate legal penalties. The nature and seriousness of the criminal conviction, whether your sentence is negotiated or determined by a judge, and continuance motions are some factors that may affect the length of the sentencing phase.