Department of Justice goes softer on white-collar crime

The beginning of the last decade and the end of the last decade are marked with different bookends in terms of legal strategy for the Department of Justice. The beginning of the 2000’s was marked with aggressive white-collar criminal cases against firms like Arthur Anderson, Enron and Tyco. By 2008, the Department of Justice had officially taken a much softer approach in policing financial fraud cases.

Federal prosecutors today use a soft approach to federal white collar crimes. One technique used in the soft strategy is deferred prosecutions. Deferred prosecutions allow for solutions other than guilty or not guilty verdicts. Deferred prosecution agreements allow companies to investigate and report their own legal missteps, and the agreements allow the government to delay or discontinue prosecution if companies promise to mend their ways.

The step away from aggressive prosecutorial strategy occurred during 2005 when the Supreme Court overturned a white-collar crime conviction in a case dealing with former accounting giant Arthur Andersen. The Department of Justice officially offered deferred prosecution for such cases in 2008.

Under the reformed legal approach the Department of Justice works with companies earlier in the investigation process and usually ask companies to conduct investigations themselves. The companies under investigation then hire outside law firms to conduct the review and report to the government.

Critics of the change say government and business have gotten too close, and the change allows companies to be let off easily. Others say the change in tactics makes the most out of limited resources available to the government.

Source: The New York Times, “As Wall St. polices itself, prosecutors use softer approach,” Gretchen Morgenson and Louise Story, 7/7/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Confidential informants may provide integral information to help build criminal investigations, but how reliable is that information when they are receiving payment for their services? To protect them, state law requires the identity of informants be kept confidential. For those facing criminal charges, however, this creates challenges in questioning the accuracy and validity of the information given at trial.
Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.