Development in criminal defense regarding cellphones

Recently, the California state legislature passed a bill that would require law-enforcement officers to obtain a warrant before searching an arrested person’s cellphone. While, the California law does not impact people who live in Minnesota, the law is central to a criminal defense discussion about information collection by law enforcement, electronic devices and search warrants.

If the bill passed by the legislature is signed by the governor, police officers in California would first have to obtain a search warrant when they believe there is probable cause to believe an arrested individual’s electronic device contains criminal evidence. The wording of the law would also apply to tablet computers, media players, digital cameras, gaming devices, flash drivers and laptop computers.

The passage of the bill came in reaction to a California Supreme Court ruling in January that legalized the warrantless search of cell phones during an arrest. The implication of the ruling also meant that criminal evidence unrelated to the suspected crime could also have been obtained.

The California state assembly unanimously passed the bill and supporters of the bill say the potential law would strengthen the rights to freedom of speech and assembly as well. Under the California Supreme Court ruling police officers could possibly obtain information about public or private gatherings.

However, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation warns that once police obtain a search warrant for an arrestee’s cellphone everything on the cellphone may become evidence. The issue remains one more to be decided. Legal experts believe the recently passed bill will send a strong message to other state legislatures regarding the cellphone warrant issue.

Source: CNN, “California bill would ban warrantless cell phone searches,” Amy Gahran, Sept. 21, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.