What is the difference between embezzlement and larceny?

A woman left her job as superintendent of a school system in order to take a similar position with a new system. According to The Courant, her former employer conducted an investigation and found she misspent nearly $9,000, using district funds in the form of a board of education credit card to purchase items to send to her children living in Minnesota and Maryland. State police charged her with first-degree larceny due to the misappropriation of money, and she has resigned from her new position and awaits trial.

In many situations in which people are accused of stealing from their employer, they are charged with embezzlement, not larceny. However, there is a small distinction between the two criminal charges that signify exactly how the crime occurred.

Defining the terms

Larceny typically refers to a theft of property in which the person who steals it never had any possession of the item in the first place. With embezzlement, the person who has stolen money or property had at one point legal possession of it and deceived the people or, in most cases, the company ownership or shareholders, in order to steal it.

As an example, if people who work for a painting company uses a brush every day and then takes it home for their own use, it would be considered embezzlement because at one point they had ownership of the brush. However, if someone unaffiliated with the company walks up and takes the brush, it would be viewed as larceny. Because the superintendent in the case was never in charge of the funds on the credit card, she was charged with larceny.

Consequences of theft

According to the Minnesota statute on theft, someone who has been convicted of larceny or embezzlement will face sentencing guidelines such as the following:

  • Up to 90 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000 for money or property worth less than $500
  • Up to one year in jail and/or a fine of up to $3,000 for items valued at between $500 and $1,000
  • Up to five years in jail and/or a fine of up to $10,000 for items valued between $1,000 or $35,000
  • Up to 10 years in jail and/or a fine of up to $20,000 for items valued between $5,000 and $35,000
  • Up to 20 years in jail and/or a fine of up to $100,000 for items valued at more than $35,000.

It is important to note that embezzling or otherwise stealing controlled substances, trade secrets, explosive devices and firearms have harsh automatic sentencing guidelines that do not factor in the value of the item. Anyone with questions regarding theft in Minnesota should contact a defense attorney.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.