A drug sniffing dog is being held by his trainer with a Police car in the background.

How a Drug-Sniffing Dog Can Get Your Case Dismissed

Drug-sniffing dogs have high error rates in detecting narcotics and their alerts may not establish probable cause for searches. If searches involving K9 units are declared unlawful because Fourth Amendment rights are violated, any evidence seized in the search can be suppressed. Many drug charges involving K9 detection are dismissed before the case ever proceeds to trial.

A drug sniffing dog is being held by his trainer with a Police car in the background.

Table of Contents

How Accurate are Drug-Sniffing Dogs?

Drug-sniffing dogs are not very accurate when it comes to discerning the presence of illegal drugs. Multiple studies show alarmingly high error rates, with some results exceeding 50 percent.

According to a recent Washington Post article, the Supreme Court is reviewing a case that questions the use of drug-sniffing dogs. The suspect in the case was suspected of dealing drugs out of his Minnesota apartment. Police initiated a search of the building using drug-sniffing dogs that alerted to smells in the hallway. Drugs were discovered inside and the suspect was charged with drug trafficking. He filed a motion to suppress the evidence, claiming his Fourth Amendment rights had been violated.

Drug detection dogs are trained by their police handlers who use rewards when the animal “alerts”. To begin training, the handler plays a game of tug with the dog using an unscented white towel. Later, some type of narcotic such as marijuana is rolled up inside the towel. Eventually, the dog starts to recognize the smell and associate it with the game and his reward.

After dogs are certified as drug-detection dogs, there is no oversight for testing the dog’s accuracy for sniffing out narcotics. As long as the dogs complete certified training, they may be used as drug-sniffing dogs by their police handlers, even if their rate of accuracy is below par compared to other dogs. It’s up to police handlers to properly train and certify their dogs for duty.

Many police handlers cue their dogs to alert on command. In such cases, dogs often alert to the presence of drugs when no drugs are present. Videos of roadside searches show indicators that drug-sniffing dogs were cued by their handlers to alert. Since dogs are sensitive to body language, they may alert based on the handler’s body language signals. These issues raise serious legal concerns about narcotic searches and seizures when drug-sniffing dogs are involved.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Confidential informants may provide integral information to help build criminal investigations, but how reliable is that information when they are receiving payment for their services? To protect them, state law requires the identity of informants be kept confidential. For those facing criminal charges, however, this creates challenges in questioning the accuracy and validity of the information given at trial.
Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.