Drug treatment courts cut down likelihood to reoffend

According to a new study offenders who have committed drug crimes and have gone through a drug treatment court are not as likely to reoffend as those who participate in adjudication processes that lack addiction treatment. Criminal sentences that do not address addiction are more expensive because they do not address the underlying issue according to one doctor who reviewed the study.

Drug courts have been expanding around the country for years and today more than 60 percent of the jurisdictions in the United States have drug courts. Drug courts are a specialized legal forum where offenders admit guilt to drug crimes and if the offenders are found to have a substance abuse issue, they can then participate in a substance abuse program that is jointly run by the court.

Offenders who participate in the substance abuse program have case managers, submit to random drug testing and regularly appear before the court. The programs range from six to 12 months, and if offenders successfully complete the program then their charges or penalties are reduced or dismissed.

Drug court programs are generally believed to be beneficial, and the study was conducted to test that belief. The study compared the experiences of drug offenders who participated in drug court with similar drug offenders who did not participate in drug court for a period of five years. Offenders who participated in the program were not as likely to commit a new crime. Offenders who participated in the program and committed another crime took a longer amount of time to reoffend than those who do not participate in drug court. Participants reoffended in 614 days and nonparticipants reoffended in 460 days.

Source: Medscape News, “Drug Court cuts recidivism, keeps offenders out of jail,” Kate Johnson, 4/21/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

Is Fingerprint Evidence Reliable?

Because fingerprints are generally considered unique, prosecutors often present fingerprint evidence as strong proof in criminal cases. However, fingerprint analysis is not always as straightforward as television crime shows make it appear. Fingerprint evidence is a type of forensic evidence used to connect a person to a crime scene, object, or location. Investigators collect fingerprints from surfaces such as weapons, vehicles, windows, phones, or packaging materials and compare them to known prints associated with a suspect.

What Is Soliciting Prostitution?

Prostitution solicitation is sometimes a felony-level offense. An example is when a defendant is accused of solicitation of a minor – a person below 18 years of age. The severity of the penalties increases as the age of the solicited child reduces.