DWI Forces FAA Director to Resign

Proving once again that DWI’s can and do happen to anyone and everyone, from all walks of life, all classes, all races, and all educational levels, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) resigned yesteday over his weekend arrest for Driving over the limit.  Compounding his problems is the fact that FAA Administator Babbitt is in charge of an organization which promotes safety in the skies, and by the airlines, including combatting terrorism.  An alleged Driving Under the Influence by Babbitt undercut his message of making Safety the Number One priority since Driving While Impaired is considered to be a threat to public safety due to numerous injuries and deaths caused every year by impaired driving.

Another problem for Babbitt was that he delayed telling his boss, the Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, for a considerable amount of time (days) after his arrest.  When the Secretary of Transportation learned of the FAA Director’s arrest through a press release issued by the Fairfax, Virginia police, you can imagine he was none too happy.  Secretary LaHood has taken the lead on transportation safety issues, more so than his predecessors, including the issues of DWI and distracted driving such as texting while driving or dialing while driving.

One of the lessons of this case is that, unfortunately, everyone is subject to getting a DWI:  Doctors, Lawyers, Judges, janitors, airline pilots, factory workers, the fellow who lives next door to you, and yes you.  Now, a fine career as FAA director has been derailed, and the country has lost the expertise of Mr. Babbitt, who was a former airline pilot for over 20 years AND the former President of the Pilots Union (ALPA).  No one with his background had ever headed the FAA before. Don’t let one split second mistake ruin your career as happened to Mr. Babbitt:  Call a cab or a friend.  Don’t drive if you think you’re even CLOSE to the limit because the risks and costs of guessing wrong are TOO HIGH.  AND, if you do get arrested for Drunk Driving in Minnesota, call an experienced, aggressive Minnesota DWI criminal defense attorney right away.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.