Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

DWI Urine Tests Still Very Open to Challenge and Unreliable

Recently, this blog reported on the Minnesota Supreme Court’s opinion issued earlier this week on February 8, 2011 regarding the question of whether DWI urine tests are reliable.  Specifically, the court did NOT decide the question of whether DWI urine tests are reliable, but instead chose to sidestep the issue on procedural grounds. The high Court refused to decide whether urine tests require a so-called Frye-Mack Hearing on their reliability.

The Supreme Court held that because the trial attorney had limited his arguments to the lack of correlation between urine alcohol concentration (UAC) and blood alcohol concentration (BAC), that it would not address the additional issues of foundational reliability for Minnesota DWI urine tests and the fact that Urine Testing has never been subject to a Frye-Mack ReliabilityHhearing in Minnesota to prove that it is reliable in DWI cases, AS WELL AS the argument that Minnesota uses “first-void” testing which has been rejected for DWI cases by almost every other state.

What does this all mean for YOUR Urine DWI case in Minnesota?  Many issues are still alive and will be challenged by our firm if you retain us to challenge your Urine DWI case.  For instance, First, the supreme court has not decided whether Urine testing for DWI’s in Minnesota needs to be subject to a Reliaiblity Hearing since one has never been held.  Second, are Urine Tests inherently unreliable because of Minnesota’s first-void method of testing, which has been rejected by over 40 states and SOFT, the National Society of Forensic Testing.  Third, are Minnesota’s Urine Tests for DWI cases unreliable and illegal because the BCA has failed to honor the Legislature’s intent when the BCA promulgated a rule allowing first-void testing to be used, which produces an unreliable test result with no correlation to BAC or actual impairment.

Keller Criminal Defense Attorneys has defended many drivers accused of a DWI based on a Urine Test, and will raise all the above, and many more, to help you defend your rights and Stay out of Jail.  Call (952) 913-1421 today to get the Defense you Deserve!

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

Is Fingerprint Evidence Reliable?

Because fingerprints are generally considered unique, prosecutors often present fingerprint evidence as strong proof in criminal cases. However, fingerprint analysis is not always as straightforward as television crime shows make it appear. Fingerprint evidence is a type of forensic evidence used to connect a person to a crime scene, object, or location. Investigators collect fingerprints from surfaces such as weapons, vehicles, windows, phones, or packaging materials and compare them to known prints associated with a suspect.

What Is Soliciting Prostitution?

Prostitution solicitation is sometimes a felony-level offense. An example is when a defendant is accused of solicitation of a minor – a person below 18 years of age. The severity of the penalties increases as the age of the solicited child reduces.