Did You Fail a Field Sobriety Test?

Field sobriety tests are used to determine probable cause for a DWI arrest during a roadside stop, but they often show inaccurate results that get innocent drivers arrested.

Table of Contents

Field Sobriety Tests are Risky

When a police officer pulls a driver over for suspicion of drunk driving, the driver will likely be subjected to one or more field sobriety tests to gauge the level of impairment. These tests use a variety of measures to help police officers determine a driver’s physical and cognitive abilities. A driver may be asked to perform certain tasks such as:

  • Walking a straight line
  • Standing on one leg
  • Touching the nose with the index finger
  • Counting the number of fingers raised by the officer
  • Taking a horizontal gaze nystagmus test
  • Taking a preliminary breath test (PBT)

Although these tests are usually difficult for most drunk drivers, many sober drivers can’t perform the required tasks. Sobriety field tests do not accurately gauge a person’s level of impairment well enough to warrant probable cause for arrest.

Under Minnesota law, drivers are not legally obligated to take field sobriety tests. Most drivers comply because they don’t know the law, or they’re trying to avoid a DWI arrest and conviction. Many people think they’re required to take a preliminary breath test (PBT) when they are pulled over. However, a PBT is performed on the scene using a hand-held device and is not required by law. In some cases, drivers who have been drinking take the PBT test out of fear of getting arrested, even if their alcohol levels are below the legal limit of .08. Drivers are only required to submit to chemical tests that measure BAC through a breathalyzer, blood, or urine test. These are normally performed at a hospital, police station, or jail.

Field sobriety tests, standardized by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, have been used by police officers for several decades. Studies show that the horizontal gaze nystagmus test used to track involuntary eye movement can register a false level of alcohol because of 40 different medical conditions, other than intoxication. Since field sobriety tests often have inaccurate results that may show probable cause for a DWI arrest, drivers should know they have a legal right to refuse the tests. A Minneapolis drunk driving lawyer often advises drivers to politely refuse field sobriety tests.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.