Federal Case Made Out of Fish Goes to U.S. Supreme Court, Fisherman Needs Criminal Justice Attorney

John Yates is a fisherman who was out on the water with his crew. He was fishing for grouper in the Gulf of Mexico. Officer Jones boarded the boat to check the sizes of the fish. Jones believed that the fisherman were keeping fish smaller than the 20-inch minimum. Jones found 72 grouper that were under the 20 inch minimum. Jones ordered the fish off the boat to check them once on main land. When the boat came on the mainland, Jones did not think the fish were the same fish he saw on the boat and thought Yates tossed the fish overboard and replaced them with larger fish.

Three years after the incident, police came and put Yates in handcuffs. They came with guns and bulletproof vests. Yates was convicted of destroying evidence to impede a federal investigation and was sentenced to 30 days in jail. He then appealed to the Supreme Court. Arguments were heard this past week and a decision will be made by next summer. He was charged under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Yates argued that the law is only meant to apply to documents and records and that fish do not fall under the act. The government argued that the law is intended to be a broad any-obstruction law and that the plain language of the statute would include the fish. Yates then argued that a fish is not a tangible object under the statute. The Supreme Court Justices will have to determine whether the government went overboard in prosecuting Yates and whether the fish fall under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

If you have been charged with a crime in federal court, contact a criminal justice attorney. A criminal justice attorney will be able to defend your rights. Max Keller is a criminal justice attorney in Minnesota. He is also licensed to practice law in federal court and successfully argued and won several cases in the Minnesota Supreme Court. Contact Keller Criminal Defense Attorneys for a free consultation. Call 952-913-1421 today.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

What Is the Exclusionary Rule in a Criminal Case?

So, what is the exclusionary rule, and how does it apply to your case? The exclusionary rule is a court-driven rule that takes effect when evidence in a criminal case is unlawfully obtained. In your case, a court might use the exclusionary rule if the illegally obtained evidence helped the officers get other pieces of evidence they would not have found otherwise.  The secondary evidence subject to the exclusionary rule is referred to as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The exclusionary rule borrows its reasoning from constitutional rights. So, it applies to criminal cases as a deterrent and remedy rather than a standalone constitutional right.

What Happens If You Violate Probation in Minnesota?

People who suspect that they have violated probation or are already facing a violation charge might ask, “What happens if you violate probation?” A probation violation in Minneapolis, Minnesota could result in a range of consequences, depending on the type and severity of the violation. Those consequences include reprimand from probation officers, enhanced supervision and stricter conditions, and probation revocation and incarceration.