Make Payment
Call Today
(952) 913-1421
Call Today
(952) 913-1421

Forfeiture Victory at Minnesota Supreme Court Breathes Life into Fourth Amendment

The Minnesota Supreme Court has ruled that the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule applies to civil forfeiture cases. Max Keller from Keller Criminal Defense Attorneys wrote an amicus brief on behalf of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice. The Minnesota Supreme Court reversed and remanded the case. This is an important and notable win for defense lawyers across the state.

Daniel Garcia-Mendoza was stopped by police officers and did not have a valid driver’s license. He was given a citation. The police then impounded the vehicle and searched it. During the search, police found 225 grams of methamphetamine in his 2003 Chevy Tahoe. He also had $611.00 of cash on him. He was charged with first-degree possession of a controlled substance. His vehicle and money were both seized. Garcia contested the forfeiture and filed a civil complaint. The court granted the states motion for summary judgment and the court of appeals affirmed. The court of appeals stated that the exclusionary rule does not apply to civil forfeiture actions.

Garcia was indicted in federal court on three counts of distribution of methamphetamine. He was convicted of two counts. In the plea agreement, Garcia agreed to forfeit any and all property that was used in connection to the violation.

The Judge in the civil forfeiture case found that the traffic stop was Unconstitutional. The Minnesota Supreme court stated that the exclusionary rule applies to civil forfeiture cases and that the evidence was illegally obtained. Civil forfeiture is a legal process that gives the police department the power to take property connected to a crime.

If you have been charged with a crime and are facing a forfeiture of your property stemming from an incident, contact Minnesota Forfeiture Attorney Max Keller.

Keller Criminal Defense Attorneys has represented many individuals in forfeiture proceedings. We have also bee successful in getting many of our clients’ property back. In certain situations, there is also a time limit that a forfeiture petition needs to be file. Be sure to contact a skilled Minnesota defense attorney to ensure you are not missing your forfeiture deadline.

Max Keller image
Attorney Max Keller
Max Keller

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Cinematic Court of Law and Justice Trial Proceedings. Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.
Court of Justice Trial. Pre-Trial Motions Hearing

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.
Man in handcuffs. Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.