Hastings mother charged with DWI with kid in car

Alleged aggravating factors associated with a drunk driving arrest can increase the level of charge that authorities may seek under Minnesota law. Generally, people may expect that a prior, or several prior, DWI convictions within the 10-years preceding a new DWI arrest will enhance the new charge to a higher level of offense. But, other aggravating factors may be alleged in enhance a charge–even for a first time offender.

Minnesota law sets the legal limit to drive at 0.08 percent blood alcohol concentration. That is essentially the same standard under any U.S. state law in DWI cases. However, Minnesota law allows prosecutors to prosecute a first-time offender with a higher level of offense based allegations that a person measured 0.20 percent BAC or more in a DWI test.

Similarly, allegations of drunk driving with a person under the age of 16 in the vehicle are considered an aggravating facto under the DWI statute.

A recent story out of Dakota County may highlight how alleged aggravating factors may up the ante during a traffic stop. Authorities claim that a 35-year-old Hastings, Minnesota woman was pulled over in Vermillion Township in Dakota County March 20 for allegedly driving erratically and speeding.

The deputy claims that the woman smelled of alcohol and apparently expanded the traffic stop to include a DWI investigation. Authorities claim that the woman admitted to having consumed a margarita at lunch, prior to the 33:30 p.m. traffic stop.

Authorities say that the woman later blew a 0.21 percent BAC reading in a breath test. Authorities also claim that the woman’s 6-year-old child was in the car. She has been charged with second-degree DWI, a gross misdemeanor offense carrying a maximum potential sentence of up to a year in jail. Mandatory minimum sentencing applies in such cases, and other civil proceedings related to licensing and the automobile may be involved in second-degree allegations.

Source: WCCO CBS Minnesota, “Hastings Woman Accused Of Driving Drunk With Child, 6,” May 22, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.