Hastings mother charged with DWI with kid in car

Alleged aggravating factors associated with a drunk driving arrest can increase the level of charge that authorities may seek under Minnesota law. Generally, people may expect that a prior, or several prior, DWI convictions within the 10-years preceding a new DWI arrest will enhance the new charge to a higher level of offense. But, other aggravating factors may be alleged in enhance a charge–even for a first time offender.

Minnesota law sets the legal limit to drive at 0.08 percent blood alcohol concentration. That is essentially the same standard under any U.S. state law in DWI cases. However, Minnesota law allows prosecutors to prosecute a first-time offender with a higher level of offense based allegations that a person measured 0.20 percent BAC or more in a DWI test.

Similarly, allegations of drunk driving with a person under the age of 16 in the vehicle are considered an aggravating facto under the DWI statute.

A recent story out of Dakota County may highlight how alleged aggravating factors may up the ante during a traffic stop. Authorities claim that a 35-year-old Hastings, Minnesota woman was pulled over in Vermillion Township in Dakota County March 20 for allegedly driving erratically and speeding.

The deputy claims that the woman smelled of alcohol and apparently expanded the traffic stop to include a DWI investigation. Authorities claim that the woman admitted to having consumed a margarita at lunch, prior to the 33:30 p.m. traffic stop.

Authorities say that the woman later blew a 0.21 percent BAC reading in a breath test. Authorities also claim that the woman’s 6-year-old child was in the car. She has been charged with second-degree DWI, a gross misdemeanor offense carrying a maximum potential sentence of up to a year in jail. Mandatory minimum sentencing applies in such cases, and other civil proceedings related to licensing and the automobile may be involved in second-degree allegations.

Source: WCCO CBS Minnesota, “Hastings Woman Accused Of Driving Drunk With Child, 6,” May 22, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

A Santa Clara University study shows that over one million people in Minnesota have criminal records. In Minneapolis alone, 5,713 crimes are reported annually within an area of 100,000 residents. These criminal cases require the defendants to present evidence challenging the prosecutor's narrative. So, when does the defense present evidence in a criminal case? Your defense team presents evidence at the trial phase right after the prosecution team completes outlining the facts it intends to prove and how its evidence will prove you guilty.
Media attention and public scrutiny after conviction can hurt your personal and professional reputation, especially if your criminal case is high-profile. One of the questions you may ask is: How do I handle media attention and public scrutiny after conviction in Minnesota? You can do that by familiarizing yourself with your rights, having a witness present during a media interview, minimizing media consumption, and taking a break from social media. Building a strong support system and working closely with a criminal defense lawyer can help you handle or minimize the impact of public scrutiny.
The timeline for filing pre-trial motions in a criminal case in Minnesota varies with the type of motion. A motion related to the discovery of evidence or dismissal of a criminal case must be filed at least three days before the Omnibus Hearing. The prosecution is then allowed to respond to the motions, and the court sets the timeline for these responses.