The Number of Innocent People Being Exonerated Hits All Time High [infographic]

A report from the National Registry of Exonerations reveals that 166 people were exonerated in 2016. The number is more than twice the exoneration rate of five years earlier.

(Article continues below Infographic)

Infographic on the number of innocent people being exonerated

Conviction Review Units

While the rate of exonerations has been steadily increasing since the National Registry of Exonerations database began in 1989, the number of people exonerated has hit record highs for the past three years. Municipalities taking steps to increase prosecutorial accountability is contributing to the increase. Dallas County, Texas is credited with creating the country’s first conviction review unit in 2007. The success of this unit and growing concern nationwide about miscarriages of justice have inspired the formation of similar programs in many other counties.

Among the most high-profile exonerations due to case review by such a unit is the Raymond Lee Jennings case. The case received national attention when it was featured on NBC’s Dateline. Jennings was tried three times for murdering 18-year-old Michelle O’Keefe in 2000. The third trial resulted in him being convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to 40 years in prison. Los Angeles District Attorney Jackie Lacey received funding from the Board of Supervisors for her review unit in 2015. Jennings was released in June of 2016 after the unit reviewed his conviction.

When Someone is Falsely Accused

The rising number of exonerations shows that innocent people need aggressive legal representation in every stage of the legal process. A Minneapolis criminal defense lawyer can advise accused individuals of their rights and best course of action based on the details of their individual cases. Anyone arrested should expect to be treated as though they are guilty by the investigators and prosecutors. Even people who have not yet been charged with a crime, but are suspects or being questioned by authorities can benefit from consulting with a criminal defense lawyer about their situation and how to best move forward.

The purpose of the criminal justice system is to protect innocent people and bring justice to victims of crimes. When an innocent person is convicted, the system has failed both the accused and the victims, and compromised the integrity of future cases. Prosecutors’ offices that form conviction review units are taking positive steps to correct wrongful convictions and prevent similar injustices from occurring again. A Minneapolis criminal defense lawyer works to protect innocent people from being wrongly convicted and ensure that those accused receive a fair trial.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.