Intellectual property, theft and Minnesota

Recently, a technical director at Valspar in Minneapolis was caught for attempting to steal $20 million of chemical formulas from the firm. His goal was to trade the formulas for a high-ranking position with a Chinese firm. For the attempted intellectual property theft, the former Valspar worker was sentenced to 15 months in jail. The story of intellectual property theft is a growing one in Minnesota and the United States.

Companies across the United States lose as much as $250 billion from intellectual property theft every year. In Minnesota, firms miss out on hundreds of millions of dollars. The companies in Minnesota most affected by intellectual property theft produce electronic circuits, advanced microprocessors, films, industrial coatings and medical devices according to a local FBI agent. Even though intellectual property theft is on the rise, prosecutions of such crimes do not always follow.

The prosecution of intellectual property crime is unique because companies affected by intellectual property theft are not always eager to admit a crime was perpetrated against them or pursue prosecution. According to law enforcement officials, companies that suffer intellectual property theft can be reluctant to pursue prosecution because they worry about their public perception and how public perception will affect their stock price. Stockholders may suspect something is wrong with a firm on news of intellectual property theft and the company may choose not to pursue their legal options in order to mitigate any worry.

On the flip side, a FBI agent based in Minneapolis says that once companies make the decision to prosecute, the prosecution has a “pretty high success rate.” The largest obstacle law enforcement faces in prosecuting intellectual property crimes is getting the company to cooperate.

Source: Star Tribune, “Fake goods, stolen secrets cost Minnesota businesses billions,” Jim Spencer, Aug. 24, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.