Lawsuit may lead to changes in Minnesota’s sex offender policy

Convicted sex offenders face notoriously harsh punishments. In fact, only one person has ever been released in the history of the 19-year-old Minnesota Sex Offender Program. A new lawsuit filed by a sex offender that was committed civilly may determine that this current system is unconstitutional. The 2011 lawsuit is yet to be resolved in federal court; in the meantime, the Minnesota Department of Human Services is starting to consider alternative correction methods that are less restrictive.

The man filing the suit is questioning the legality of the civil commitment program. He claims that the program keeps people locked up even after their prison sentence is over. A spokesperson from the Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota states that it is unlawful to jail people under the presumption that they will commit future crimes. He points to the state constitution, which indicates that people are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

The man was originally sent to prison for sexual assaults involving children. In 1994, the courts determined that he was mentally ill and a danger to the community. He has since been back and forth between the treatment program and prison. During his time in the MSOP, he organized a group that has used billboards to communicate the cost of keeping sex offenders locked up. MSOP directors report that taxpayers do indeed spend over $81 million each year to support the 698 sex offenders currently in the program.

The man is also petitioning a court to force leaders of the MSOP to recognize his marriage. The man claims that he legally married another sex offender, also in the program, through the Iowa mail. While the man and his alleged husband are not being considered for the new, less-restrictive environments, they state that they will continue to fight against the MSOP.

It’s arguable whether or not people convicted of sex crimes should be kept in confinement even after their prison term is over. Regardless of the severity of their original crime, however, there’s no question that imprisoning a person for something they may do in the future is a violation of civil liberties.

Source: northlandsnewscenter.com,

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Students with juvenile convictions in their records and intending to apply for college may wonder, “Do juvenile crimes impact college admissions?” A juvenile crime in Minnesota can lower the odds of your child’s college application getting approved. A conviction of a serious juvenile crime may result in an automatic rejection of college applications. A minor with a criminal record may be disqualified from accessing student loans or grants.
Defendants convicted of a crime may ask, “What is the post-conviction process, and how long does it take?” A petition for post-conviction relief allows you to contest the legality of a criminal conviction or sentence following an unsuccessful direct appeal process or passing the appeal deadline. This petition involves legal issues not addressed at trial or direct appeal. These issues include a constitutional rights violation, newly discovered evidence, and inadequate or ineffective lawyer representation.
Knowing how long the sentencing phase takes in Minneapolis, MN, can help you ease worries and work towards receiving a fair sentence. The sentencing phase of the criminal justice process usually takes only minutes, especially when the judge approves the sentence negotiated in a plea bargain. Sentencing can sometimes be lengthy, particularly when you get convicted at trial, and the judge schedules a hearing to a later date to decide on appropriate legal penalties. The nature and seriousness of the criminal conviction, whether your sentence is negotiated or determined by a judge, and continuance motions are some factors that may affect the length of the sentencing phase.