List reveals southeast Minnesota priests accused of sex crimes

Victims of sexual abuse in the church have been trying to get lists of accused priests published for years. Recently, the Diocese of Winona came forward with a list naming 14 priests that may have been involved in the sexual abuse of minors. The list was submitted to a district court in Ramsey County just one day prior to a judge’s established deadline. The formation of the list was part of a judicial order that required Minneapolis and St. Paul churches to release a similar list earlier in the month. That list named 34 priests.

According to one attorney that represents victims of sex crimes, these lists help keep children safe. Also, he argues that the lists may help victims to seek confidential help rather than suffering in silence. One advocate for abuse victims, a former priest, stated that the list is a good start but is by no means comprehensive. He believes that the number of priests involved in sexual abuse may be much larger. He also states that the lists should reveal when church leaders found out about the abuse and what was done to cover up the incidents.

Some of the priests on the list are now deceased. One of the five clergy that is sill alive was removed from his position. Three more priests on the list will be removed soon. One bishop from the diocese has apologized for the alleged crimes and has expressed his hope that the church and community can move forward. Advocates for the victims state that bishops must have the courage to contact police when these allegations arise, otherwise no progress will take place.

Even though the crimes that are alleged in this situation are particularly despicable and involve a severe breach of trust, it must be remembered that these are just accusations. The priests are innocent until proven guilty in the courts, regardless of the public outrage surrounding them.

Source: kare11.com, “Winona Diocese priest list released” No author given, Dec. 16, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

A Santa Clara University study shows that over one million people in Minnesota have criminal records. In Minneapolis alone, 5,713 crimes are reported annually within an area of 100,000 residents. These criminal cases require the defendants to present evidence challenging the prosecutor's narrative. So, when does the defense present evidence in a criminal case? Your defense team presents evidence at the trial phase right after the prosecution team completes outlining the facts it intends to prove and how its evidence will prove you guilty.
Media attention and public scrutiny after conviction can hurt your personal and professional reputation, especially if your criminal case is high-profile. One of the questions you may ask is: How do I handle media attention and public scrutiny after conviction in Minnesota? You can do that by familiarizing yourself with your rights, having a witness present during a media interview, minimizing media consumption, and taking a break from social media. Building a strong support system and working closely with a criminal defense lawyer can help you handle or minimize the impact of public scrutiny.
The timeline for filing pre-trial motions in a criminal case in Minnesota varies with the type of motion. A motion related to the discovery of evidence or dismissal of a criminal case must be filed at least three days before the Omnibus Hearing. The prosecution is then allowed to respond to the motions, and the court sets the timeline for these responses.