Man charged with felony DWI after traffic stop in Rosemount

Many drivers in Minnesota understand that charges of driving while impaired are considered enhanceable offenses under state law. A first-time offender may face a fourth-degree DWI charge, if alcohol tests taken within two hours of the alleged drunk driving offense show results falling between 0.08 percent and 0.20 percent alcohol levels.

Second-time DWI offenders generally can face a gross misdemeanor charge if the prior DWI conviction was entered within ten years of the second offense. This blog has previously discussed the ten year look-back period in DWI cases.

Recently, a man was pulled over in Rosemount for allegedly weaving in traffic and then stopping in the middle of the road. Police claim that the driver appeared to have difficulty in concentrating and did not exercise his right to remain silent.

Law enforcement claims that the man admitted to having consumed eight 16-ounce beers earlier in the evening on the night of the stop. Although news reports indicate that the man has not had a prior conviction within ten years of the stop, the man was reportedly arrested on felony DWI charges.

In August 1993, the driver had settled charges of criminal vehicular operation. That criminal record, dating back nearly 19 years, is now reportedly being used to enhance the current allegations in a first-degree DWI complaint. Authorities are apparently relying on the prior CVO conviction to bring the current felony DWI charge.

Minnesota law allows prosecutors to seek a first-degree DWI charge if the driver has been convicted of DWI three times in the past ten years, or has had his or her driver’s license suspended or revoked related to a DWI offense in the past ten years. The state cannot bootstrap a prior DWI revocation and DWI conviction related to the same incident to enhance a current charge.

However, authorities can also seek to enhance a current DWI charge to the felony level based upon a prior felony DWI conviction, regardless of any time frame. It is important to remember that DWI charges are not only serious offenses, but that the law allows for more strict penalties on current charges based solely upon prior conduct.

If you have been arrested for DWI in Minnesota, it is important to consider speaking with an experienced Twin Cities DWI defense attorney as soon as possible to learn what defenses may be available, as the associated DWI loss of license and any potential conviction can not only be serious in the short term, but each can weigh more heavily in any potential future allegations.

Source: WCCO TV Channel 4, “Man Caught Weaving In Rosemount Charged With DWI,” Jan. 19, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.