Man stopped for DWI now faces nine felony assault charges

Police claim a 26-year-old man from Akeley, Minnesota, resisted arrest during a DWI stop early Saturday morning. The incident allegedly occurred at roughly 1:30 a.m. in Hubbard County. News reports do not indicate why a state trooper originally decided to pull the man over. However, law enforcement claims the traffic stop grew more serious after the suspect did poorly on field sobriety tests.

Prosecutors say in a criminal complaint that the driver resisted arrest after the field sobriety tests. The complaint alleges the trooper attempted to place the driver in handcuffs on suspicion of DWI charges when he reached for the trooper’s Taser. Law enforcement claims the man then hit the trooper over the head several times with the Taser. The trooper says the driver pulled the Taser trigger, but the safety on the device was engaged so it did not fire.

The driver then tried to reach for the trooper’s handgun, according to the criminal complaint. Backup officers reportedly arrived and the driver reportedly fled the scene. Law enforcement claims the man tried to ram two squads with his car during a police chase, but the driver then crashed his vehicle. Officers say they used mace as they attempted to place the driver into a squad car after he was apprehended. Police claim the man kicked one of the officers in the chest during the incident.

The man reportedly had a prior DWI, dating from 2008. Minnesota law looks back ten years for prior convictions. Any prior DWI convictions entered within ten years of current allegations can be used to enhance a current DWI charge.

The Akeley man, however, now faces more serious charges than only the DWI allegations. Based upon the police reports, prosecutors are seeking nine counts of assault, including first-degree assault related to the alleged events surrounding the DWI investigation.

Source: CBS News, “Trooper making DWI arrest in Minn. is beaten with her own Taser,” Barry Leibowitz, Oct. 26, 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.