Minnesota Appeals Court Expungement Ruling Good for Employment Prospects

A serious criminal conviction can be a challenging thing to live with. Even long after repaying your debt to society, your past can come back to haunt you, impairing your ability to get a good job, obtain a professional license or find suitable housing.

Yet, under certain circumstances, Minnesota law allows individuals to expunge their old criminal convictions. In fact, a new appellate ruling issued by the Court of Appeals on Apr. 12, 2012, makes expungement even more readily available for Minnesotans.

Court Deemed to Have Authority to Expunge Both Judicial and Executive Records

Five years after pleading guilty to a felony charge of aggravated forgery, the respondent in the case State v. M.D.T. was eager to move on with her life. She had originally filed an expungement petition pro se — in other words, without the help of a lawyer — but it was denied. However, her second expungement petition, submitted with the help of a Minnesota criminal expungement attorney, was approved by a district court.

Still, the judgment was not final. Along with the county attorney involved in the case, Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson appealed the ruling, claiming that the district court overstepped its authority by ordering the expungement of the respondent’s criminal records, putting the case in the hands of the Court of Appeals.

In Minnesota, there is no guarantee of expungement, but if your crime is not among the most serious offenses, and you can convince a judge that you have been disadvantaged by your criminal record, sealing your criminal record will not adversely affect public safety, and you have rehabilitated yourself, you have a good chance at expungement.
On appeal, the court found that the respondent had met these requirements, but there was still a question of whether the original trial court had the authority to expunge not just the criminal records maintained by the judicial branch, but also those held by executive branch authorities like the BCA (Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension).

The appellate court reasoned that since the executive branch maintains criminal records as the result of judicial branch action (i.e., entering a conviction) that Courts should be able to expunge executive branch records created by the Courts themselves. In addition, executive branch records need to be sealed for a judicial expungement order to be meaningful, and there are practical protections still built in that allow executive records to be reopened for good cause. Thus, the court was within its authority to expunge all the respondent’s criminal records, both judicial and executive.

Career Derailed By Criminal Record? Expungement May Be the Answer

A felony conviction can be devastating for employment prospects. In the recent appellate case, before her expungement, the respondent was denied a job by at least six prospective employers due to her felony conviction — she was even fired from a position she’d already obtained when her past came up in a background check. Thankfully, the recent ruling should help get her career back on track.

The ruling may be helpful for you too. If you have a conviction in your past, contact a Minnesota criminal expungement attorney today to learn how to clear your record of old legal indiscretions.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can Past Allegations of Sex Crimes Be Used Against You in Minnesota?

One question people charged with a sex crime in Minneapolis, MN, ask is: Can past allegations of sex crimes be used against me? Under Minnesota Rules of Evidence, past sex crime allegations aren't admissible as evidence in court to prove a suspect's character and argue that it contributed to the commission of the current crime. However, there are circumstances in which the court may allow prior allegations or bad conduct as evidence. These circumstances include when the prosecution can demonstrate that prior allegations or acts are key to establishing intent, identity, or pattern of bad conduct related to the current crime.

What If The Alleged Victim Was Drunk? Minnesota Consent & Alcohol Laws

Under Minnesota consent & alcohol laws, it is unlawful to engage in sexual contact or intercourse with someone drunk or intoxicated to a degree that prevents that person from consenting, understanding, or keeping his or her actions in check. Simply put, you should avoid sexual contact with a person who visibly looks impaired by alcohol, drugs, or other intoxicating substances.

How Long Do Police Have to File Drug Charges in Minnesota?

People facing arrests or under investigation for drug-related crimes often wonder: How long do police have to file drug charges in Minnesota? Once police officers conclude their investigations and arrest you for drug trafficking, the law bars them from holding you in custody for long. But, even if they can't keep you in jail, the Minnesota statute of limitations allows the prosecution to file the charges within three (3) years of arrest.