Minnesota counties try to deal with abundance of jail spaces

Rural and suburban counties in Minnesota are trying to deal with a criminal law conundrum; the question of how to deal with the cost of an abundance of unused jail spaces. Multiple counties have built new facilities or upgraded old facilities to increase jail capacity while the overall crime rate has declined. Criminal experts and criminal defense experts are not sure what has caused the decline in the crime rate. Regardless, the resulting circumstance is an oversupply of spaces at a time when there is less demand.

At the moment, as many as 3,000 jail cells in Minnesota sit empty. As the county administrator from Goodhue County put it, the situation is good from a criminal standpoint but difficult from a financial perspective. At the beginning of the last decade many suburban and rural counties in Minnesota increased their jail cell space under the belief that older jails from the previous century needed to be upgraded and under the belief that some extra space could be used as a source of revenue. The frenzy of improved and new jail space created 2,000 new beds since 2003. Accepting the lack of need today, many counties are looking to share costs.

Usually the costs of health care and food diminish as the number of prisoners decrease but costs for maintenance and utilities remain. In addition, the amount of revenue produced by inmates is also decreased by commissary purchases and work release programs. In counties where there are few women prisoners, the expense of maintaining specialized spaces and staff is also burdensome. Therefore counties are pondering the creation of regional facilities to concentrate individually under utilized infrastructure as well as the use of joint contracts to save on other expenses.

Source: Star Tribune, “3,000 Minnesota jail cells sit empty,” Katie Humphrey and David Peterson, 6/5/11

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.