Minnesota Ignition Interlock Program Turns One, Highlights DWI Laws

July 2012 marks the one-year anniversary of Minnesota’s DWI ignition interlock program. An ignition interlock is a device affixed to a vehicle that will not allow it to start unless the driver provides a breath sample and his or her blood alcohol level registers below a preset limit (in Minnesota, .02, the equivalent of about one drink). Ignition interlocks also require drivers to provide periodic breath samples while operating their vehicles.

A first-time DWI offense at a blood alcohol concentration of 0.16 or above and all repeat DWI offenses are very serious under Minnesota law. Part of the punishment for these offenses is the loss of your driver’s license for one year or more. However, since July 1, 2011, Minnesotans charged with DWI have been able to regain their driving privileges much more quickly by agreeing to the use of an ignition interlock.

In the first year of Minnesota’s statewide ignition interlock program, 2,796 DWI offenders took advantage of it and were able to regain early legal driving privileges.

Officials are hopeful that Minnesota’s ignition interlock program will continue to be successful into its second year. As the program matures, authorities are also stepping up DWI enforcement; a law enforcement crackdown was scheduled in July to commemorate the one-year anniversary of the ignition interlock program.

July also marks the closing of a legal loophole that may result in more drivers installing ignition interlocks. Formerly, a first-time DWI offender arrested with an alcohol concentration (AC) between .16 and .199 could plead guilty and get his or her driver’s license back in just 30 days without having to apply for the ignition interlock program. But, according to the Department of Public Safety, this was actually an oversight in the original law. It has since been rectified in the 2012 Transportation Omnibus bill, and first-time DWI offenders with a high AC arrested after June 30, 2012, will now have no options to regain their driving privileges beyond an ignition interlock.

A DWI charge is difficult to overcome if you cannot drive afterwards — work, school, family obligations, even day-to-day chores can be all but impossible without transportation. But, Minnesota’s ignition interlock program is one tool that can help you get over a DWI. Call a Minnesota DWI attorney today to learn more about the ignition interlock program and how it might play into a successful drunk driving defense.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.