Minnesota should use sobriety checkpoints, Mothers Against Drunk Driving says

In 2012, more than one-quarter of fatal traffic accidents in Minnesota were alcohol-related, according to the state’s Department of Public Safety. Mothers Against Drunk Driving rated the state poorly in terms of having countermeasures in place in order to reduce drunk driving, despite the fact that there were 5,000 fewer DUI arrests last year than the year before. The group suggests that the state should start utilizing checkpoints to nab intoxicated drivers.

Violating basic rights

The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution protects U.S. citizens from unreasonable searches and invasions of privacy. According to the Governors Highway Safety Administration, 12 states, including Minnesota, do not allow sobriety checkpoints, citing that they violate either the federal or state constitution. In essence, these states contend that checkpoints permit law enforcement to investigate drivers without any indication that there has been wrongdoing.

Under ordinary circumstances, law enforcement officers are not permitted to pull over vehicles without a good reason: speeding, driving erratically, failing to stop at a light or for equipment concerns like a missing taillight. However, a checkpoint permits officers to bypass this rule, raising concern that such a loophole could open the way to other types of searches without the need for cause or a warrant.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a split decision regarding roadblocks in Michigan that the checkpoints are necessary to reduce drunk driving, even though they violate a basic constitutional right. As one dissenting justice pointed out, however, it is not prudent to limit individual rights for checkpoints that research shows may only have a small effect on overall traffic safety. Clearly, several states agree with the dissenting opinion that checkpoints are a violation of individual liberty.

Permitting the practice

In the many states that do permit checkpoints, law enforcement must abide by guidelines that the U.S. Supreme Court developed. Those guidelines mandate that the date and location of the checkpoint must be announced. Additionally, law enforcement must have a good reason for holding the checkpoint, such as an increase in drunk driving in a particular area. Lastly, there must be a set plan in place for determining which cars will be pulled over, such as every other car or every third car. Some states have developed exceptions to these guidelines, providing a more lax environment.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Getting falsely accused of domestic violence in Minnesota may put you at risk of losing your job, custody of your children, or even your home. You may face criminal charges and the accusation may damage your reputation in the community, as people will now view you as an abuser. False domestic violence accusations often happen when couples are in a contentious relationship with a risk of divorce.
The top reasons for license suspension in Minnesota include driving under the influence of alcohol, repeated traffic violations, and failure to appear in court or pay fines. Failure to pay child support, criminal convictions and felonies, medical conditions/disabilities, and drag racing can also lead to license suspension. The suspension takes away your driving privileges, preventing you from driving legally.
Motorists arrested for allegedly driving while impaired might wonder, “Can you refuse a breathalyzer?” In Minnesota, the implied consent law requires a person licensed to drive, control, or operate a vehicle to agree to a chemical test to check for alcohol or other intoxicants in that person’s body. Refusing to submit to a breathalyzer or another chemical test is a crime, often charged as a gross misdemeanor.