Minnesota’s Sex Offender Treatment Program

The Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP) was created in 1993 to allow for the institutionalization of sex offenders after they have finished serving their prison sentences, but before they are released back into society. After nearly 20 years, the program has yet to rehabilitate and release a single offender. Twenty-six patients have died in the treatment facilities at Moose Lake and St. Peter, but none have returned to being contributing members of society.

Since 2003, the program has ballooned by more than 400 percent to an operating budget of $72 million a year. Each sex offender enrolled in the program costs the state $134,000 annually, three times the cost of a conventional prisoner. The largest single request in Gov. Tim Pawlenty’s bonding proposal this January was an $89 million expansion of the Moose Lake facility, representing 13 percent of the $685 million proposal. Many opponents believe the rapid growth of the program is not economically sustainable. Scrutiny over the program’s expenses intensified last year when The Star Tribune revealed that two dozen flat-screen TVs were installed in the Moose Lake facility common rooms at the extravagant cost of $2,282 a piece.

The Department of Human Services noted that the cost of the program per patient has dropped precipitously as the program expands the number of involuntary patients. Minnesota now has the highest number of civilly committed sex offenders, per capita, in the United States.

The catalyst for the rampant expansion of the MSOP came in 2003 when Dru Sjodin was abducted, raped and brutally murdered by a Level III sex offender recently released from prison after serving 23 years. The abduction crossed state lines, so the case was tried in federal court and attracted an extensive amount of national media attention. The incident prompted the creation of the Dru Sjodin National Sex Offender Public Registry. Since the trial, the number of sex offenders enrolled in the MSOP has tripled.

When faced with the reality of such a grisly crime, paying the cost of treatment appears preferable to running the risk of a repeat offense from a recently released sexual predator. The Minnesota Department of Corrections conducted a study from 1990 to 2002 and found that after three years of release, the reconviction rate for sex offenders dropped from 17 percent in 1990 to just 3 percent in 2002. The reduction in recidivism since 1990 is likely due to the longer and more intense post-release supervision of sex offenders. The average length of post-release supervision increased by 50 months from 1990 to 2002; the percentage of sex offenders placed on Intensive supervised release (ISR) grew 53 percent. Nearly 60 percent of repeat offenders did not receive any post-release supervision.

The study led the Minnesota Department of Corrections to conclude that treatment and supervision has been effective in greatly reducing sex offense recidivism. It draws into question the expansion of the costly Minnesota Sexual Offender Program, which focuses entirely on institutionalizing sex offenders rather than rehabilitating them and returning them to society. The efficacy of the MSOP cannot be tested as none of the patients have ever been released.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Confidential informants may provide integral information to help build criminal investigations, but how reliable is that information when they are receiving payment for their services? To protect them, state law requires the identity of informants be kept confidential. For those facing criminal charges, however, this creates challenges in questioning the accuracy and validity of the information given at trial.
Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.