Mother of slain woman harasses police, suspect

When Minnesota police and prosecutors choose to arrest a suspect and file charges, we expect that they have found sufficient evidence to accuse someone of a crime. Especially with high-publicity, violent crimes, it is even more important that prosecutors don’t just throw around charges because of the serious consequences that will follow an allegation of murder.

After a man was arrested and charged with the alleged murder of his ex-girlfriend, questions have been raised about whether the state had enough information to arrest, charge and prosecute him. Some think that the woman’s mother exerted excessive pressure on police to make an arrest. According to the boyfriend’s attorney, the woman met with the lead detective 28 times in one year and at least once with the chief of the police in an effort to push the police department to arrest the boyfriend.

It wasn’t just the police that the mother had targeted, however. One month after the supposed murder, the mother started using her daughter’s email and cellphone to leave disturbing messages for the boyfriend and his family. In one of the messages the mother specifically told the man to “enjoy the sunshine” while he could, possibly referencing her single-minded push to convict him of her daughter’s alleged murder.

The mother has also been sending the boyfriend and his parents packages, cards and pictures. What used to be a close-knit group has now turned into outright animosity. The mother sent the suspect’s mother a Valentine’s Day card last year calling her evil. The mother also has not denied many of these actions. She has admitted to sending the suspect and his family considerable letters, voicemails, emails and packages, but she claims that all of her communication has been civil.

It is understandable that the mother of someone who was allegedly murdered would be upset and may even do some things she wouldn’t have normally done, but there is no excuse for badgering and harassing someone just because she believes he or she is a suspect. It is certainly unacceptable for police to succumb to such pressure and bring someone in that they don’t have the evidence to arrest.

Source: San Antonio Express-News, “Slaying suspect was haunted by victim’s mother,” Craig Kapitan, Feb. 9, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.
Minnesota recently passed a public safety bill that brings sweeping changes to the state’s juvenile justice system. While minors sometimes run afoul of the law, the juvenile justice system seeks to account for the differences between children and adults. Therefore, while the penalties for adults convicted of crimes focus on punishment, those for juveniles are aimed at diversion and restorative practices.