New Revenge Porn Law in Minnesota

On August 1, 2016 a new law will go into effect in the state of Minnesota that is designed to crack down on individuals who disseminate private sexual images or attempt to solicit sex for another person without consent. According to Minneapolis felony lawyer Max Keller, “The bill creates long overdue remedies to protect victims of revenge porn while more effectively defining the terms of the crime itself.”

In recent years, revenge porn has developed into a growing crime that has affected the lives of innocent victims throughout the United States. Advances in technology and the expansion of the internet have enabled perpetrators to easily spread sexual photos, videos and even solicitations for sexual encounters all over the world in just a matter of days. Under the new law, anyone who is convicted of revenge porn can face gross misdemeanor charges that could result in up to $3,000 in fines, one year behind bars, or both.

When aggravating factors are present, the crime can be upgraded to a felony, which could result in a convicted individual spending up to five years in prison and facing up to $10,000 in fines. Depending on the circumstances surrounding the crime, the courts may also award compensation to the victim for other damages that are linked to revenge porn. Since these charges can include court costs, reasonable attorney fees, financial losses and up to an additional $10,000 in civil penalties, the costs involved with a conviction can add up quickly.

While the new law is a positive step to protect the rights of revenge porn victims, it is important to remember that many of these cases involve innocent defendants who are in fact victims of angry revenge themselves. According to attorney Max Keller, “It is hoped that the clearer definitions that are provided in the bill will also protect defendants who are wrongfully accused.”

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

How a DWI Affects CDL Holders in Minnesota

Commercial motor vehicle drivers arrested or charged with driving while impaired (DWI) may need to know how a DWI affects CDL holders in Minnesota. You will lose your Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) for at least a year if you are convicted of DWI for the first time, and forever after a second conviction. The consequences go beyond the immediate legal implications of a DWI conviction. A CDL suspension or revocation will lead to job loss, difficulty finding employment, and serious financial challenges.

How a DWI Affects Rideshare Drivers in Minnesota

Knowing how a DWI affects rideshare drivers in Minnesota allows you to take the right steps to protect your license and livelihood. A DWI conviction will lead to suspension or cancellation of your driver’s license. Once you lose your license, you will be ineligible for a work permit required to work for rideshare companies as a driver. You may also face jail time, fines, or ignition interlock device (IID) installation, depending on the seriousness and number of related offenses on your record.

Can Police Search Your Phone Without a Warrant in Minnesota?

People under criminal investigation or whose phones have been seized by law enforcement officers may ask, “Can police search your phone without a warrant in Minnesota?” It’s illegal for police to search your phone without a warrant. However, there are exceptions to the warrant requirement. These exceptions include when you consent to the search, someone’s life is in danger, or there is an immediate risk of evidence destruction.