NTSB recommends 0.05 percent for state DWI charges, P. 1

Earlier this month the National Transportation Safety Board made a recommendation that states should lower the legal limit to drive to 0.05 percent blood alcohol concentration. Readers of this blog may understand that Minnesota law currently sets the legal limit at 0.08 percent–that is the point at which the law presumes impairment of any driver, regardless of other factors. Generally, Minnesota’s DWI laws allow authorities to seek DWI charges based upon alleged evidence of impairment without the alcohol test, but many cases involve multiple charges as prosecutors hope to cover their bases.

We have also discussed issues surrounding the accuracy and reliability of alcohol testing as DWI defense lawyers have raised issues challenging the science of alcohol testing methods. Many commentators say that lowering the threshold for DWI charges to 0.05 percent may not do much to curb alcohol related crashes, while increasing the number of DWI cases filed against drivers who may not be impaired by the lower threshold.

One group known for its advocacy for making drunk driving laws stronger, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, reportedly is not fully endorsing the NTSB recommendation. MADD officials reportedly prefer to focus on such ideas as greater use of ignition interlocks, high visibility law enforcement procedures and technological changes to vehicles to prevent drunk driving (which seems to overlap the ignition interlock idea).

DWI charges can carry significant penalties, even for a first-time offense under Minnesota law. Our laws up the ante further for second and subsequent DWI offenses. Lowering the threshold will undoubtedly expose a greater number of drivers to criminal consequences based upon the theory of presumed impairment should such a recommendation ever be enacted in Minnesota. Later this week we will continue discussing the recent NTSB recommendation.

Source: Tampa Tribune, “Attorneys warn against lower DUI threshold,” Ray Reyes, May 26, 2013; USA Today, “Make DUI limit 0.05% blood-alcohol level, NTSB says,” Bart Jansen, May 14, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Students with juvenile convictions in their records and intending to apply for college may wonder, “Do juvenile crimes impact college admissions?” A juvenile crime in Minnesota can lower the odds of your child’s college application getting approved. A conviction of a serious juvenile crime may result in an automatic rejection of college applications. A minor with a criminal record may be disqualified from accessing student loans or grants.
Defendants convicted of a crime may ask, “What is the post-conviction process, and how long does it take?” A petition for post-conviction relief allows you to contest the legality of a criminal conviction or sentence following an unsuccessful direct appeal process or passing the appeal deadline. This petition involves legal issues not addressed at trial or direct appeal. These issues include a constitutional rights violation, newly discovered evidence, and inadequate or ineffective lawyer representation.
Knowing how long the sentencing phase takes in Minneapolis, MN, can help you ease worries and work towards receiving a fair sentence. The sentencing phase of the criminal justice process usually takes only minutes, especially when the judge approves the sentence negotiated in a plea bargain. Sentencing can sometimes be lengthy, particularly when you get convicted at trial, and the judge schedules a hearing to a later date to decide on appropriate legal penalties. The nature and seriousness of the criminal conviction, whether your sentence is negotiated or determined by a judge, and continuance motions are some factors that may affect the length of the sentencing phase.