NTSB recommends 0.05 percent for state DWI charges, P. 1

Earlier this month the National Transportation Safety Board made a recommendation that states should lower the legal limit to drive to 0.05 percent blood alcohol concentration. Readers of this blog may understand that Minnesota law currently sets the legal limit at 0.08 percent–that is the point at which the law presumes impairment of any driver, regardless of other factors. Generally, Minnesota’s DWI laws allow authorities to seek DWI charges based upon alleged evidence of impairment without the alcohol test, but many cases involve multiple charges as prosecutors hope to cover their bases.

We have also discussed issues surrounding the accuracy and reliability of alcohol testing as DWI defense lawyers have raised issues challenging the science of alcohol testing methods. Many commentators say that lowering the threshold for DWI charges to 0.05 percent may not do much to curb alcohol related crashes, while increasing the number of DWI cases filed against drivers who may not be impaired by the lower threshold.

One group known for its advocacy for making drunk driving laws stronger, Mothers Against Drunk Driving, reportedly is not fully endorsing the NTSB recommendation. MADD officials reportedly prefer to focus on such ideas as greater use of ignition interlocks, high visibility law enforcement procedures and technological changes to vehicles to prevent drunk driving (which seems to overlap the ignition interlock idea).

DWI charges can carry significant penalties, even for a first-time offense under Minnesota law. Our laws up the ante further for second and subsequent DWI offenses. Lowering the threshold will undoubtedly expose a greater number of drivers to criminal consequences based upon the theory of presumed impairment should such a recommendation ever be enacted in Minnesota. Later this week we will continue discussing the recent NTSB recommendation.

Source: Tampa Tribune, “Attorneys warn against lower DUI threshold,” Ray Reyes, May 26, 2013; USA Today, “Make DUI limit 0.05% blood-alcohol level, NTSB says,” Bart Jansen, May 14, 2013

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

A Santa Clara University study shows that over one million people in Minnesota have criminal records. In Minneapolis alone, 5,713 crimes are reported annually within an area of 100,000 residents. These criminal cases require the defendants to present evidence challenging the prosecutor's narrative. So, when does the defense present evidence in a criminal case? Your defense team presents evidence at the trial phase right after the prosecution team completes outlining the facts it intends to prove and how its evidence will prove you guilty.
Media attention and public scrutiny after conviction can hurt your personal and professional reputation, especially if your criminal case is high-profile. One of the questions you may ask is: How do I handle media attention and public scrutiny after conviction in Minnesota? You can do that by familiarizing yourself with your rights, having a witness present during a media interview, minimizing media consumption, and taking a break from social media. Building a strong support system and working closely with a criminal defense lawyer can help you handle or minimize the impact of public scrutiny.
The timeline for filing pre-trial motions in a criminal case in Minnesota varies with the type of motion. A motion related to the discovery of evidence or dismissal of a criminal case must be filed at least three days before the Omnibus Hearing. The prosecution is then allowed to respond to the motions, and the court sets the timeline for these responses.