How parents can prevent underage drinking problems

There are various theories that swirl around when it comes to teaching kids the rights and wrongs about alcohol use. According to a Minnesota study, it seems like at least one popular theory can be ruled out.

The idea that it is wise for parents to drink with their kids or allow underage drinking under their supervision is proven to be misguided. Based on the study, the kids don’t grow up to more safely use alcohol. In fact, they are more likely to have problems with drinking and its many negative consequences.

Bloomberg Businessweek describes the study that came to that conclusion. Researchers from the University of Minnesota’s School of Nursing followed groups of teenagers, some from the U.S. and others from Australia. Both countries generally have different attitudes toward drinking; yet, the conclusion of the study came up with the same trends for both groups of teens.

Researchers found out about the teens’ alcohol use and whether they drank with their parents or under their parents’ supervision. The Australian teens were more likely to have begun drinking with their parents, but among both the groups of teens who did so, they shared similar alcohol-related problems in the near future: alcohol addiction, drunken blackouts and violent episodes related to drinking.

So, basically, the idea that “I’d rather have them do it under my roof,” according to research, is a dangerous philosophy to live by. If the study’s findings are a true reflection of what happens when parents allow underage drinking, that one seemingly progressive decision could mean health and legal trouble for their kids in the future.

What do you think?

Source

Bloomberg Businessweek: “You’re Not Doing Your Teen Any Favors by Letting Them Drink,” Robert Preidt, 29 Apr. 2011

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.