The Plea for Freedom

Criminal cases often involve plea deals where a defendant receives a reduced sentence for pleading guilty to one or more crimes. Plea deals can be negotiated at any stage during the judicial process, and are typically used in criminal cases where the evidence of a defendant’s guilt is overwhelming. They allow for the swift resolution of criminal cases which can take months to resolve in court. Plea deals increase efficiency for court systems and reduce court costs, but they often make appeals for new trials and release more difficult for defendants who accept them.

Controversial Plea Deals

A plea deal is an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant or defendant’s felony lawyer where the defendant agrees to plead guilty to receive a charge for a lesser offense or a reduced sentence for a crime. In many states, plea deals are controversial. The state’s attorney’s office often refuses to hear persuasive innocence claims and reexamine cases that involve plea deals. Prosecutors will often fight for years to prevent the introduction of any new evidence or reexamination of old evidence. When judges order new trials or grant writs of innocence, prosecutors often bargain for plea deals that would maintain guilty pleas and convictions to keep people incarcerated.

The Consequences of Plea Deals

When a defendant accepts a plea deal by pleading guilty or no contest to a crime, guilt is established and results in a criminal conviction. The conviction shows up on the defendant’s criminal record, and he/she will lose any rights and privileges that would normally be taken away by a trial conviction. In Alford pleas, a defendant is allowed to maintain his/her innocence for the record and usually given time-served arrangements. With these type of plea deals, a defendant may be granted his/her freedom, but gives up the right to clear his/her name.

Defendants frequently accept plea deals to get reduced sentences and avoid the expense and stress of a court trial. Plea deals do allow defendants some negotiating terms for their sentences before going to trial, but they also prevent the opportunity to be found not guilty for the alleged crime. Defendants who take plea deals waive opportunities to examine or challenge the evidence normally presented against them in a trial. Once plea deals are accepted, later appeals become difficult because the court considers them voluntary actions where defendants admit to their guilt for the crime.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.
Minnesota recently passed a public safety bill that brings sweeping changes to the state’s juvenile justice system. While minors sometimes run afoul of the law, the juvenile justice system seeks to account for the differences between children and adults. Therefore, while the penalties for adults convicted of crimes focus on punishment, those for juveniles are aimed at diversion and restorative practices.