Police accuse former Minnesota Viking of identity theft

Vikings fans in Minneapolis may remember Michael Bennett, the Vikings first-round draft choice in 2001. For five years, Bennett entertained fans as a running back, but now he is the subject of a federal investigation on identity theft. Though police have said that he’s confessed to his criminal charges, it is not entirely clear that he had a chance to speak to his attorney before talking with police.

The 33-year-old ex-Viking was arrested in April when FBI investigators claim that he altered a financial statement that said he had $9 million. Agents have said that Bennett was trying to get a $200,000 loan from a financial services store that was being staked-out by the FBI. The former Viking entered the store with a bank statement that apparently said he had $9 million of collateral. The statement did have his name on it and officers claim that Bennett immediately confessed to altering it.

The Star Tribune reports that the moment Bennett tried to collect the loan, he was arrested and confessed. It is unknown, however, if Bennett was read his Miranda rights and whether he realized that he had the ability to consult with an attorney before talking with police. Everyone who is taken into custody has the right to ignore police questioning and keep quiet. They also can interrupt any interrogation and request an attorney and officers must respect these wishes. The problem is, not everyone knows they have these rights and so an arresting officer is supposed to remind suspects of them.

When they don’t, it is sometimes possible for a confession to be thrown out. In this case, it remains to be seen what will happen with Bennett’s supposed confession.

Source: Star Tribune, “Ex-Vikings running back Bennett jailed in ID theft,” Paul Walsh, May 1, 2012

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

Recent Posts

What Is the Exclusionary Rule in a Criminal Case?

So, what is the exclusionary rule, and how does it apply to your case? The exclusionary rule is a court-driven rule that takes effect when evidence in a criminal case is unlawfully obtained. In your case, a court might use the exclusionary rule if the illegally obtained evidence helped the officers get other pieces of evidence they would not have found otherwise.  The secondary evidence subject to the exclusionary rule is referred to as the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. The exclusionary rule borrows its reasoning from constitutional rights. So, it applies to criminal cases as a deterrent and remedy rather than a standalone constitutional right.

What Happens If You Violate Probation in Minnesota?

People who suspect that they have violated probation or are already facing a violation charge might ask, “What happens if you violate probation?” A probation violation in Minneapolis, Minnesota could result in a range of consequences, depending on the type and severity of the violation. Those consequences include reprimand from probation officers, enhanced supervision and stricter conditions, and probation revocation and incarceration.