Entrapment: When the Police Cross the Line

Prosecuting certain crimes often involves sting operations with undercover police officers to catch criminals. When law enforcement uses tactics that entice suspects to commit a crime, it can constitute police entrapment.

What Constitutes Police Entrapment?

Certain victimless crimes such as prostitution, pornography distribution, and narcotics offenses rely heavily on undercover law enforcement sting operations. Police officers pose as criminals to gain the confidence of suspected criminals involved in crimes that are under investigation. Sting operations often involve bribery tactics, fencing, and solicitation of suspects by undercover agents. In undercover cases, police officers are allowed to use certain tactics to induce suspects to commit a crime or confess to a crime to instigate an arrest. However, if police officers exceed allowed limits, actions may constitute police entrapment. In such cases, suspects have the right to consult a criminal defense lawyer for entrapment charges.

Entrapment Standards

The United States Supreme Court enforces federal entrapment standards to protect innocent victims from police entrapment. The court states that the primary duties of police officers is to prevent crimes rather than punish crimes. The court argues that it is not a police officer’s duty to incite and create crime for the sole purpose of prosecuting and punishing suspected criminals who likely would not have committed the crime if not enticed or lured by police officers.

To determine if police entrapment has been committed, many states apply the federal entrapment test. This test looks to see if law enforcement officers or undercover agents lured a suspect into committing a crime through enticement actions based on the suspect’s criminal history. Other states ignore the suspect’s criminal background and focus only on incentive or enticement activities by police officers. Certain law enforcement techniques typically do no constitute entrapment under both federal and state entrapment standards. Such crimes include:

  • Agreeing to buy or sell drugs
  • Agreeing to buy or sell stolen property
  • Offering to engage in solicitation of prostitution
  • Posing as a minor in a pornography investigation
  • Impersonating a hit man in a murder investigation
  • Leaving keys in an unlocked car during a police surveillance for auto theft

Through the years, a criminal defense lawyer has seen numerous cases of police entrapment brought before the U.S. Supreme Court. Cases cover a variety of crimes dating back to prohibition days and the illegal sale of moonshine whiskey. Entrapment cases often include solicitation of suspects for various drug offenses, pornography crimes, and tax evasion.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With Drug Possession if the Drugs Aren’t Yours in Minnesota?

You can be charged with drug possession if the drugs aren’t yours in Minnesota. This is one of the most misunderstood areas of criminal law. Many people assume that if they did not own or physically hold the drugs, they cannot be charged. In reality, Minnesota law allows prosecutors to pursue charges based on something called constructive possession.

What Happens if You Contact the Alleged Victim After Charges Are Filed in Minnesota?

If you contact the alleged victim after charges are filed in Minnesota, you may be putting your case, your freedom, and your future at risk. Once criminal charges are filed, courts often impose strict no-contact conditions, either through bail conditions, release orders, or protective orders. Violating those conditions can lead to additional criminal charges, even if your intent was harmless.

Accused of Sharing Intimate Images Without Consent in Minnesota? What to Know

Being accused of sharing intimate images without consent in Minnesota can have consequences that go far beyond the criminal justice system. These cases often involve allegations tied to digital communication, private relationships, and intent, which makes them both legally complex and highly sensitive.