After Post Conviction Proceedings and Exoneration, Foua Fong Lee Seeks Compensation for Wrongful Incarceration

Foua Fong Lee was released from custody after serving three years in prison for criminal vehicular homicide. In 2004 he crashed into another car and three people were killed. At the time, he was driving his Toyota Camry. New evidence discovered after his trial was over showed that other people with the same car had uncontrollable acceleration issues. Lee had stated that he too had a car that accelerated beyond his control.  The new evidence was brought up during his post conviction relief proceedings. A court granted his post conviction relief Petition, vacated his conviction, and ordered that he be set free.  Lee is now seeking compensation for his wrongful incarceration pursuant to the Wrongful Imprisonment Law passed by Minnesota in 2014. The Wrongful Imprisonment Law gives claimants approximately $50,000 for each year of false imprisonment. The law also allows for lost wages and educational reimbursement. Lee is now attending school in hopes to become a social worker.

What are post conviction proceedings?

Post conviction proceedings refer to motions, briefs, or appeals after a guilty verdict is entered. It is possible to file a post conviction relief brief to the District Judge who sentenced the Defendant in the first place. In the brief, a criminal defense attorney can offer new evidence to attempt to change a judge’s mind. If a post conviction relief brief is denied by the district court judge, a criminal defense attorney can then file an appeal with the court of appeals. Issues may include ineffective assistance of counsel, sufficiency of the evidence, and improper rulings on Spreigl evidence. etc. Issues for an appeal differ in every case and are dependent on the facts of each case.

If you believe you have sufficient grounds for post conviction proceedings, contact Keller Criminal Defense Attorneys. A criminal defense attorney will be able to file the necessary motions and briefs specific to your case. Keep in mind that there are timelines for filing an appeal and that you should contact a criminal defense attorney as soon as you have been found guilty. Additionally, if you believe you have a case similar to Lee, and if you believe you deserve compensation pursuant to the Wrongful Imprisonment Law, contact a criminal defense attorney at Keller Criminal Defense Attorneys. Call 952-913-1421 for a free consultation.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Stay calm and compose after getting accused of a crime but not charged in Minneapolis, MN. Do not discuss the facts of your case with anyone, including your relatives and family members. Hire a criminal defense attorney with a demonstrated record of winning cases like yours. Your attorney will discuss your rights, guide you on how to cooperate with law enforcement within the legal boundaries, and build a solid defense strategy to fight the charges you could face in the future.
Expungement and sealing of records in Minnesota affect how your criminal history appears to government agencies and the public. The main difference between the two legal actions is that expungement permanently removes past arrests, criminal charges, or convictions from private and public databases, while sealing hides the criminal record from the public. Courts, government entities, and law enforcement agencies can access sealed criminal records.
Minnesota recently passed a public safety bill that brings sweeping changes to the state’s juvenile justice system. While minors sometimes run afoul of the law, the juvenile justice system seeks to account for the differences between children and adults. Therefore, while the penalties for adults convicted of crimes focus on punishment, those for juveniles are aimed at diversion and restorative practices.