Prosecutors insist on trying man on 26-year-old charge

People in Minneapolis have certainly heard of cold cases, but many likely assume that cold cases involve murder, rape or some kind of other crime that has a victim and carries a certain degree of grief. Something like driving under the influence of alcohol, especially if it did not include a car accident or injuries, seems somewhat silly to prosecute years after it allegedly happened.

In addition, pursuing a charge of drunk driving well after it supposedly happened is unfair to the defendant. While police reports with results of field sobriety tests and breath or blood tests will still be accessible 10, 20 or 30 years later, witnesses for the defense that could contradict a police report may not remember important details or there may be no way of contacting anyone who knew anything about the incident after a while. Regardless, a police report that was written at the time of the incident may carry more weight than recollected witness testimony anyways.

This is the situation that is facing one man who is being prosecuted on a nearly-26-year charge of drunk driving. When he was 21 years old, in 1987, the young man was found stumbling in a parking lot by police who were reporting to the scene of an accident. The responding officer wrote that he found the young man in an apartment building’s parking complex, smelling of alcohol and with slurred speech. What the officer did not find, however, was the young man driving, nor was he even in a vehicle. The officer assumed, however, that he had been driving because was in a parking lot. When tested, the reports claim he was above the legal limit for alcohol.

To this day, the now-46 year old insists he had not been driving and had not been intoxicated.

What makes this case particularly interesting, however, is that since the time he was originally charged with drunk driving, the man believed his charges had been dropped and he moved abroad. Since his move, he has returned to the United States and has even renewed his license several times, never once having a problem until recently. Now, since the arrest warrant and drunk driving charge have come to light, the prosecutor insists on following through on the charges.

Source: South Florida Sun Sentinel, “Letter from defendant revives 1987 DUI case in Broward,” Rafael Olmeda, March 18, 2013

Our law firm has worked with many people who have been charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. To find out more about our work and seriousness of these crimes, please visit our website.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

A Santa Clara University study shows that over one million people in Minnesota have criminal records. In Minneapolis alone, 5,713 crimes are reported annually within an area of 100,000 residents. These criminal cases require the defendants to present evidence challenging the prosecutor's narrative. So, when does the defense present evidence in a criminal case? Your defense team presents evidence at the trial phase right after the prosecution team completes outlining the facts it intends to prove and how its evidence will prove you guilty.
Media attention and public scrutiny after conviction can hurt your personal and professional reputation, especially if your criminal case is high-profile. One of the questions you may ask is: How do I handle media attention and public scrutiny after conviction in Minnesota? You can do that by familiarizing yourself with your rights, having a witness present during a media interview, minimizing media consumption, and taking a break from social media. Building a strong support system and working closely with a criminal defense lawyer can help you handle or minimize the impact of public scrutiny.
The timeline for filing pre-trial motions in a criminal case in Minnesota varies with the type of motion. A motion related to the discovery of evidence or dismissal of a criminal case must be filed at least three days before the Omnibus Hearing. The prosecution is then allowed to respond to the motions, and the court sets the timeline for these responses.