Do Sex Offender Registries Prevent Future Offenses?

Recent studies show that sex offender registries do not prevent future offenses as intended because they fail to address the sex offender’s behavior. Although they make people within the community feel safer, they do not actually protect public safety.

Sex Offenders and Recidivism

Research on sex offender registries and recidivism makes it very clear that sex offender registries do not reduce or prevent future offenses. Community notification and registries don’t do anything to change the behavior of the sex offender. Their main goal is to let the public know who have committed sex offenses and where they are residing.

Since sex offenders and offenses vary significantly, it’s impossible to put offenders into a homogeneous group. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to dealing with sex offenders and crimes. A sex crime attorney sees a variety of offenses and each one has very different circumstances. Crimes that involve child pornography, sex trafficking, and prostitution are very different than crimes that involve sexual assault. Since the reasons behind the crimes and offender behaviors are so varied, there is no way to predict if offenders will commit future offenses.

Sex Offender Registries

If sex offender registries do not reduce recidivism, why keep them? The main reason is to keep the public informed. Parents of small children, as well as the general public, want to know if sex offenders are living nearby in their communities. Since all criminal records are public information, the public and the government feel that sex offender registries should be open to the public.

In 1991, Minnesota was the first state in the country to establish a public sex-offender registry. The Adam Walsh Act of 2006 established new national registry standards which imposed penalties on states that didn’t comply with registry standards, created a national Internet database of offenders and established a national office to track offenders. Since then, sex offender registries have been implemented in all 50 states.

When someone is charged with a sex crime and placed on a sex offender registry, they are required to inform police and/or other public safety officials where they live and work. They must get permission to move and to travel. Some states including Florida, Oklahoma, Nevada, and Tennessee require sex offenders to carry special state ID cards or driver’s licenses that identify them as sex offenders. In all states, sex offenders who fail to register in a timely manner can incur additional felony charges.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Experience: Practicing since 1997
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

Can You Be Charged With a Drug Crime Based on Text Messages Alone?

You can be charged with a drug crime based on text messages alone in Minnesota, especially when the messages show intent to purchase, sell, distribute, or traffic drugs. Prosecutors often use text messages to demonstrate intent to commit a drug crime, show a history of drug activity, link you to a specific phone, and corroborate physical evidence. Text messages often strengthen the probable cause required for the police to arrest and charge you. They are, however, not sufficient for a conviction without compelling supporting physical evidence.

Can the Police Lie to You During an Interrogation in Minnesota?

Criminal defendants who interact with police officers for the first time are often left wondering, “Can the police lie to you during an interrogation?” Police officers can lie to you during an interrogation. In fact, deception is a lawful and fully permitted police technique provided the officers do not use it to force a confession. Police often claim possession of non-existent evidence or witnesses to trick you into disclosing information that can aid their investigation.