Do Sex Offender Registries Prevent Future Offenses?

Recent studies show that sex offender registries do not prevent future offenses as intended because they fail to address the sex offender’s behavior. Although they make people within the community feel safer, they do not actually protect public safety.

Sex Offenders and Recidivism

Research on sex offender registries and recidivism makes it very clear that sex offender registries do not reduce or prevent future offenses. Community notification and registries don’t do anything to change the behavior of the sex offender. Their main goal is to let the public know who have committed sex offenses and where they are residing.

Since sex offenders and offenses vary significantly, it’s impossible to put offenders into a homogeneous group. There is no one-size-fits-all approach to dealing with sex offenders and crimes. A sex crime attorney sees a variety of offenses and each one has very different circumstances. Crimes that involve child pornography, sex trafficking, and prostitution are very different than crimes that involve sexual assault. Since the reasons behind the crimes and offender behaviors are so varied, there is no way to predict if offenders will commit future offenses.

Sex Offender Registries

If sex offender registries do not reduce recidivism, why keep them? The main reason is to keep the public informed. Parents of small children, as well as the general public, want to know if sex offenders are living nearby in their communities. Since all criminal records are public information, the public and the government feel that sex offender registries should be open to the public.

In 1991, Minnesota was the first state in the country to establish a public sex-offender registry. The Adam Walsh Act of 2006 established new national registry standards which imposed penalties on states that didn’t comply with registry standards, created a national Internet database of offenders and established a national office to track offenders. Since then, sex offender registries have been implemented in all 50 states.

When someone is charged with a sex crime and placed on a sex offender registry, they are required to inform police and/or other public safety officials where they live and work. They must get permission to move and to travel. Some states including Florida, Oklahoma, Nevada, and Tennessee require sex offenders to carry special state ID cards or driver’s licenses that identify them as sex offenders. In all states, sex offenders who fail to register in a timely manner can incur additional felony charges.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.