When stealing a cellphone becomes a federal offense

In 2014, a Minneapolis man broke into more than 20 cellphone stores across five states. According to the StarTribune, the man would steal phones and then allegedly sell them to an international crime ring. He was charged with conspiracy to engage in interstate transportation of stolen property, which any criminal defense attorney in St. Paul knows is a federal offense.

The details of the case

In order to break into the stores, the man would target companies in a strip mall that had vacant spaces next door. He would then break into the empty storefront and burrow through the wall into the neighboring cellphone store. If the store’s security system went off, law enforcement might notice that the doors and windows of the store had been unharmed, leading them to believe that no crime had taken place.

The defendant in this case was arrested after accidentally dropping his phone in one of the stores. A “selfie” on the phone led law enforcement to the man’s apartment. Agents found more than a half a pound of methamphetamine at the home, and they believe the man intended to distribute it. Investigators also found a bag filled with what they called burglary tools, such as a crowbar.

The cellphone black market

DNA evidence and footprints linked the defendant to at least nine burglaries in Minnesota and roughly a dozen more in Illinois, Missouri, Michigan and Wisconsin. Prosecutors have charged that the man sold the cellphones to the Mustafa Organization. The organization would hire runners who would either commit theft or use false information to obtain expensive cellphones. The devices were then sold overseas for a significant amount of money. In 2014, 20 members of the Mustafa crime organization were indicted on charges of stealing phones and other electronic devices.

As a criminal defense attorney in St. Paul has seen, similar charges were brought against a California couple who would pay homeless people to purchase a cellphone and a usage plan. The couple would then ship the phones to Asia, where the devices would net up to $1,000 apiece. According to Wired magazine, the couple made millions of dollars before getting arrested and sentenced to time in prison.

A federal crime

The Minneapolis man will be prosecuted in federal court for the theft. Under the National Stolen Property Act, it is a federal offense to do any of the following:

  • Transport stolen goods worth $5,000 or more across state lines
  • Sell stolen goods valued at $5,000 or more
  • Accept stolen goods as a security for a loan

Anyone who has questions regarding theft and federal offenses should consult with a criminal defense attorney in St. Paul.

Max Keller has won countless jury trial cases involving misdemeanors and felonies, sex crimes, and DWI’s. He is a member of the Minnesota Society for Criminal Justice, which only allows the top 50 criminal defense attorneys in the state as members. Max is a frequent speaker at CLE’s and is often asked for advice by other defense attorneys across Minnesota.

Years of Experience: Approx. 20 years
Minnesota Registration Status: Active
Bar & Court Admissions: State of Minnesota Minnesota State Court Minnesota Federal Court 8th Circuit Federal Court of Appeals State of Maryland

What to Do If You Have Been Charged with a Criminal Offense

The Surprising Cost of a Guilty Criminal Plea in Minnesota

Defendants in Minnesota may plead guilty or accept deals without understanding the hidden cost of a guilty criminal plea. A guilty criminal plea, regardless of how appealing it appears, can leave you dealing with substantial lifelong consequences. You may skip lengthy trial proceedings and likely get a lenient sentence, but end up with a criminal record. The record can lead to various financial and collateral consequences, including difficulty in securing employment, loss of housing rights, license revocation, and immigration issues.

What You Can Expect at a Pre-Trial Motions Hearing in Minnesota

The pre-trial motions hearing is a court session you attend after your first arraignment. At the hearing, the prosecution and defense appear before a judge to clear several details about the case before trial. These details include pre-trial motions, evidentiary queries, and constitutional matters.

Refusing Arrest vs. Resisting Arrest in Minnesota: What’s the Difference?

Highly publicized incidents of police using excessive force over the past few years have led to people wondering, “What’s the difference between refusing arrest vs. resisting arrest?” Resisting arrest in Minnesota occurs when you use force to prevent a police officer from making a lawful arrest. Refusing an arrest, on the other hand, involves statements or actions that show reluctance to cooperate with an officer’s instructions without using force.